How perceptions of bone marrow donation costs affect donation behavior: survey evidence from a large donor registry

Over the past three decades, advancements in collection methods for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation substantially reduced invasiveness and safety concerns. To what extent, however, registered donors are informed about extraction methods and how their beliefs drive their willingness to follow through with a donation is not well understood. Inaccurate beliefs about extraction methods may cause donors to overestimate their perceived cost, potentially reducing donations. In a survey with about 24,000 potential donors in Germany's largest stem-cell registry, we investigate how beliefs about extraction methods affect potential donors' willingness to follow through with a stem cell donation. We find widespread misconceptions about extraction methods, with many donors attributing a significant fraction of stem cell extractions to be coming from never-used methods. Importantly, a lack of knowledge and misconceptions about extraction methods persist among registered donors, often anchored to methods that prevailed at the time of registration. Exploring the link between donors' beliefs and their (stated) willingness to donate, we find that accurate beliefs about lower extraction costs correlate with a 2.2-2.9 percentage points higher willingness to donate, representing a 40% reduction in donor unavailability. Our results highlight the need for informational campaigns to correct donors' misconceptions and potentially save more lives among blood cancer patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The European Journal of Health Economics
Published
2025-05-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-025-01785-4
Primary Topic
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How perceptions of bone marrow donation costs affect donation behavior: survey evidence from a large donor registry

Susanne Seitz, Mario Macis, Alexander H. Schmidt, Robert Slonim et al.
The European Journal of Health Economics
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
article

How perceptions of bone marrow donation costs affect donation behavior: survey evidence from a large donor registry

Susanne Seitz, Mario Macis, Alexander H. Schmidt, Robert Slonim, Michael Haylock, Patrick Kampkötter, Daniel Wiesen, Edith Wienand
article en

Abstract

Over the past three decades, advancements in collection methods for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation substantially reduced invasiveness and safety concerns. To what extent, however, registered donors are informed about extraction methods and how their beliefs drive their willingness to follow through with a donation is not well understood. Inaccurate beliefs about extraction methods may cause donors to overestimate their perceived cost, potentially reducing donations. In a survey with about 24,000 potential donors in Germany's largest stem-cell registry, we investigate how beliefs about extraction methods affect potential donors' willingness to follow through with a stem cell donation. We find widespread misconceptions about extraction methods, with many donors attributing a significant fraction of stem cell extractions to be coming from never-used methods. Importantly, a lack of knowledge and misconceptions about extraction methods persist among registered donors, often anchored to methods that prevailed at the time of registration. Exploring the link between donors' beliefs and their (stated) willingness to donate, we find that accurate beliefs about lower extraction costs correlate with a 2.2-2.9 percentage points higher willingness to donate, representing a 40% reduction in donor unavailability. Our results highlight the need for informational campaigns to correct donors' misconceptions and potentially save more lives among blood cancer patients.

The European Journal of Health EconomicsVol. 26(9)
University of Technology Sydney (AU), Johns Hopkins University (US), Johns Hopkins Medicine (US), Deutsche Knochenmarkspenderdatei (DE), University of Duisburg-Essen (DE), University of Tübingen (DE), Erasmus University Rotterdam (NL)
Universität Duisburg-Essen
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.