Statistical Perspectives on Reproducibility: Definitions and Challenges

Abstract Reproducibility is a widely discussed topic, yet many experimental results cannot be confirmed due to factors such as publication bias, poor documentation, and inappropriate statistical methods. A lack of standard definitions for reproducibility and related terms further complicates the matter. This paper reviews the literature on reproducibility, clarifies key terminology by defining five types of reproducibility, and addresses variations in published definitions by considering changes in datasets, labs, and experimental conditions. We explore the causes of low reproducibility in scientific studies and discuss statistical perspectives on quantifying and improving reproducibility. In particular, we propose framing statistical reproducibility as a predictive problem, providing a framework to evaluate and address reproducibility challenges.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Statistical Theory and Practice
Published
2025-05-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s42519-025-00459-x
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Machine Learning and Data Classification
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
14.89

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Statistical Perspectives on Reproducibility: Definitions and Challenges

Andrea Simkus, Claus Bendtsen, Tahani Coolen‐Maturi, Frank P. A. Coolen
6 citations
Journal of Statistical Theory and Practice
Machine Learning and Data Classification
14.89
article

Statistical Perspectives on Reproducibility: Definitions and Challenges

Andrea Simkus, Claus Bendtsen, Tahani Coolen‐Maturi, Frank P. A. Coolen
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Abstract Reproducibility is a widely discussed topic, yet many experimental results cannot be confirmed due to factors such as publication bias, poor documentation, and inappropriate statistical methods. A lack of standard definitions for reproducibility and related terms further complicates the matter. This paper reviews the literature on reproducibility, clarifies key terminology by defining five types of reproducibility, and addresses variations in published definitions by considering changes in datasets, labs, and experimental conditions. We explore the causes of low reproducibility in scientific studies and discuss statistical perspectives on quantifying and improving reproducibility. In particular, we propose framing statistical reproducibility as a predictive problem, providing a framework to evaluate and address reproducibility challenges.

Journal of Statistical Theory and PracticeVol. 19(3)
AstraZeneca (United Kingdom) (GB), Durham University (GB)
AstraZeneca, Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Machine Learning and Data Classification
14.89
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.