The historical evolution and modernization path of China’s ecological and environmental governance

China's ecological environmental governance systems and models have been constantly improved over more than 40 years' endeavors in ecological environmental protection and its ecological environmental governance is now entering a new phase of modernization construction, which is an essential step in realizing the “Beautiful China” strategic objectives and advancing the modernization of national governance systems and capabilities. This study demonstrates that China's ecological environmental governance can be divided into three stages: state-dominated unidimensional governance led by the government under the planned economy (1978–1992); dual governance by the government and the market under the socialist market economy (1993–2012); multi-dimensional co-governance of the government, the market, and societal forces in the new era (2013-present). It analyzes the evolutionary process and features of the three stages, explores their evolutionary logics by studying their historical missions, developmental logics, governance paradigms and strategic shifts, and suggests feasible ways to China's modernization governance. The study highlights how institutional innovations addressed complex ecological challenges and proposes five ways for governance modernization: rationalizing governance logic; optimizing structural configurations; innovating methodological tools; strengthening institutional mechanisms; harmonizing objective systems, aiming to operationalize the ecological civilization vision. Finally, by synthesizing China's achievements and persisting gaps, the study gives targeted policy recommendations that emphasize coordinated actions in pollution remediation, biodiversity conservation, and climate governance, thereby constructing a cohesive analytical paradigm that not only deciphers the endogenous logic of China's environmental governance evolution but also advances practical solutions aligned with the goals of global sustainability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy & Environmental Sustainability
Published
2025-05-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eesus.2025.100014
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Regional Development and Environment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
33.61

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The historical evolution and modernization path of China’s ecological and environmental governance

Zhanfeng Dong, Bin Wang, Chaofeng Shao
8 citations
Energy & Environmental Sustainability
Regional Development and Environment
33.61
article

The historical evolution and modernization path of China’s ecological and environmental governance

Zhanfeng Dong, Bin Wang, Chaofeng Shao
article en
8 citations

Abstract

China's ecological environmental governance systems and models have been constantly improved over more than 40 years' endeavors in ecological environmental protection and its ecological environmental governance is now entering a new phase of modernization construction, which is an essential step in realizing the “Beautiful China” strategic objectives and advancing the modernization of national governance systems and capabilities. This study demonstrates that China's ecological environmental governance can be divided into three stages: state-dominated unidimensional governance led by the government under the planned economy (1978–1992); dual governance by the government and the market under the socialist market economy (1993–2012); multi-dimensional co-governance of the government, the market, and societal forces in the new era (2013-present). It analyzes the evolutionary process and features of the three stages, explores their evolutionary logics by studying their historical missions, developmental logics, governance paradigms and strategic shifts, and suggests feasible ways to China's modernization governance. The study highlights how institutional innovations addressed complex ecological challenges and proposes five ways for governance modernization: rationalizing governance logic; optimizing structural configurations; innovating methodological tools; strengthening institutional mechanisms; harmonizing objective systems, aiming to operationalize the ecological civilization vision. Finally, by synthesizing China's achievements and persisting gaps, the study gives targeted policy recommendations that emphasize coordinated actions in pollution remediation, biodiversity conservation, and climate governance, thereby constructing a cohesive analytical paradigm that not only deciphers the endogenous logic of China's environmental governance evolution but also advances practical solutions aligned with the goals of global sustainability.

Energy & Environmental SustainabilityVol. 1(2)
Nankai University (CN), Chinese Academy for Environmental Planning (CN)
National Office for Philosophy and Social Sciences
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Regional Development and Environment
33.61
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.