La vida social de los plaguicidas en Poncitlán, Jalisco

Objective: To analyse the circulation, uses, and perspectives on pesticides in communities from Poncitlán, Jalisco, a region where a controversy over the use of these substances and the unusual incidence of chronic kidney disease of non-traditional causes exists. Methodology: Ethnographic fieldwork carried out between 2021 and 2024, which included participant observation, field notes, and semi-structured interviews with peasant men and women and key informants. Results: For most people, pesticides are seen as a necessary tool for agricultural work, and they have the uncertainty of causing damage to the environment and the health of those who use them. Value: Empirical contribution to the debate on the perspectives, uses, and consequences of pesticides. Limitations: The results are specific to the region of study. Conclusions: Pesticides are substances that circulate freely in different settings, where actors give them ambivalent and contradictory meanings, perpetuating uncertainty about their effects.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
región y sociedad
Published
2025-05-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22198/rys2025/37/1954
Primary Topic
Latin American rural development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

La vida social de los plaguicidas en Poncitlán, Jalisco

Carlos Emiliano Arteaga Flores, César Padilla‐Altamira
región y sociedad
Latin American rural development
article

La vida social de los plaguicidas en Poncitlán, Jalisco

Carlos Emiliano Arteaga Flores, César Padilla‐Altamira
article en

Abstract

Objective: To analyse the circulation, uses, and perspectives on pesticides in communities from Poncitlán, Jalisco, a region where a controversy over the use of these substances and the unusual incidence of chronic kidney disease of non-traditional causes exists. Methodology: Ethnographic fieldwork carried out between 2021 and 2024, which included participant observation, field notes, and semi-structured interviews with peasant men and women and key informants. Results: For most people, pesticides are seen as a necessary tool for agricultural work, and they have the uncertainty of causing damage to the environment and the health of those who use them. Value: Empirical contribution to the debate on the perspectives, uses, and consequences of pesticides. Limitations: The results are specific to the region of study. Conclusions: Pesticides are substances that circulate freely in different settings, where actors give them ambivalent and contradictory meanings, perpetuating uncertainty about their effects.

región y sociedadVol. 37
Centro de Investigación y Estudios Superiores en Antropología Social (MX)
Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología, Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología, Paraguay
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Latin American rural development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.