Are There Really People With No Inner Voice? Commentary on Nedergaard and Lupyan (2024)

The idea that some people completely lack inner speech is of both scientific and popular interest. In a recent study, Nedergaard and Lupyan compared self-reporting high and low inner-speech-prevalence groups and found that participants in the low-prevalence group performed worse on a verbal working memory test and responded more slowly and less accurately during rhyme judgments. These results represent an original contribution to the study of inner speech. However, the authors go on to draw the unfounded conclusion that their findings, together with previous empirical and anecdotal data, show that some people have no inner speech at all. They have coined the term <i>anendophasia</i> for this trait. This commentary examines Nedergaard and Lupyan's claim of demonstrated anendophasia; I conclude they present no compelling evidence that some individuals lack inner speech.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Psychological Science
Published
2025-05-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/09567976251335583
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Action Observation and Synchronization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.88

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Are There Really People With No Inner Voice? Commentary on Nedergaard and Lupyan (2024)

Andreas Lind
2 citations
Psychological Science
Action Observation and Synchronization
4.88
article

Are There Really People With No Inner Voice? Commentary on Nedergaard and Lupyan (2024)

Andreas Lind
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The idea that some people completely lack inner speech is of both scientific and popular interest. In a recent study, Nedergaard and Lupyan compared self-reporting high and low inner-speech-prevalence groups and found that participants in the low-prevalence group performed worse on a verbal working memory test and responded more slowly and less accurately during rhyme judgments. These results represent an original contribution to the study of inner speech. However, the authors go on to draw the unfounded conclusion that their findings, together with previous empirical and anecdotal data, show that some people have no inner speech at all. They have coined the term <i>anendophasia</i> for this trait. This commentary examines Nedergaard and Lupyan's claim of demonstrated anendophasia; I conclude they present no compelling evidence that some individuals lack inner speech.

Psychological ScienceVol. 36(9)
Lund University (SE)
Svenska Forskningsrådet Formas
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Action Observation and Synchronization
4.88
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Are There Really People With No Inner Voice? Commentary on Nedergaard and Lupyan (2024) — Andreas Lind · Psychological Science (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS