Critical events in the development of scientific thinking among communication and journalism students

University studies represent large, overarching changes in students’ epistemological beliefs and thinking skills. Scientific thinking skills are crucial for communication and journalism (CJ) students and graduates. However, the development of CJ students’ thinking remains relatively unexplored. The aim of this study was to understand students’ perceptions of the characteristics and significance of critical events in the development of scientific thinking in CJ university education. We employed interview data (N=34) from students in two Finnish universities. In a qualitative critical event analysis, we identified four types of critical events in the five-year education of the students; (a) first times, (b) learning hands-on and gaining agency, (c) thinking together, and (d) working hard and overcoming challenges. The development of scientific thinking through critical events was experienced by the students as epistemological change and strengthened competence as a future academic expert. Altogether, our results shed light on thinking development as a tumultuous process in communication education, and how this process relates to students’ emerging professional expertise. We discuss both the theoretical and pedagogical implications of our findings to communication education–especially the importance of challenging students in scientific thinking, offering early research-oriented teaching, and acknowledging the overarching role of scientific thinking throughout the curriculum.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Prologi
Published
2025-05-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33352/prlg.161684
Primary Topic
Education and Critical Thinking Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Critical events in the development of scientific thinking among communication and journalism students

Katja Lehtisaari, Tessa Horila, Marianna Langenoja
Prologi
Education and Critical Thinking Development
article

Critical events in the development of scientific thinking among communication and journalism students

Katja Lehtisaari, Tessa Horila, Marianna Langenoja
article en

Abstract

University studies represent large, overarching changes in students’ epistemological beliefs and thinking skills. Scientific thinking skills are crucial for communication and journalism (CJ) students and graduates. However, the development of CJ students’ thinking remains relatively unexplored. The aim of this study was to understand students’ perceptions of the characteristics and significance of critical events in the development of scientific thinking in CJ university education. We employed interview data (N=34) from students in two Finnish universities. In a qualitative critical event analysis, we identified four types of critical events in the five-year education of the students; (a) first times, (b) learning hands-on and gaining agency, (c) thinking together, and (d) working hard and overcoming challenges. The development of scientific thinking through critical events was experienced by the students as epistemological change and strengthened competence as a future academic expert. Altogether, our results shed light on thinking development as a tumultuous process in communication education, and how this process relates to students’ emerging professional expertise. We discuss both the theoretical and pedagogical implications of our findings to communication education–especially the importance of challenging students in scientific thinking, offering early research-oriented teaching, and acknowledging the overarching role of scientific thinking throughout the curriculum.

PrologiVol. 21(03)
Tampere University (FI)
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Education and Critical Thinking Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.