The effect of black tea and water temperature on the disintegration of gelatine and HPMC capsules, tested with the paddle device, GastroDuo and in vivo pharmacokinetics: Much ado about little

Fluid co-administered with oral medication directly affects its behaviour. Often, people use fluids other than water when taking their medications. Capsules (mainly gelatine- and HPMC-based) are widely used solid oral dosage forms. The presented study aimed to investigate the behaviour of gelatine and HPMC capsules in several fluids <i>in vitro</i> and <i>in vivo</i>. The second aim was to assess the influence of administered fluids on the gastric emptying. The third aim was to assess the usability and predictive power of different <i>in vitro</i> methods for drug analysis and compare them with <i>in vivo</i> data. For <i>in vitro</i> studies, two systems with different complexities were used: the compendial USP 2 apparatus and the GastroDuo biorelevant model. In both systems, 25 mL of SGF and 240 mL of tested fluid were used. To obtain the <i>in vivo</i> data, a clinical study with 12 young and healthy volunteers was performed. In this study, the salivary tracer technique, which utilises caffeine kinetics as a marker of a dosage form behaviour in the GIT, was used. <i>In vitro</i>, the temperature strongly affected the opening times of gelatine capsules (rapid opening in warm media and slower in cold). <i>In vivo</i>, the opening time of gelatine capsules in warm black tea was slightly delayed in comparison to warm water. The differences in opening times between warm and cold water and warm black tea and cold water were significant. In USP 2 Apparatus, HPMC capsules were more sensitive to the tested media than in the biorelevant GastroDuo model. There were no significant differences in the opening times of HPMC capsules <i>in vivo</i>. Gastric emptying of warm water, cold water or warm black tea was not affected, suggesting that the altered <i>in vivo</i> absorption kinetics was caused by the <i>in vivo</i> behaviour of the capsules, depending on their properties and not by changes in the gastric emptying of the co-administered fluids. The presented study allows a better understanding of gelatine and HPMC capsules behaviour <i>in vitro</i> and <i>in vivo</i> administered with different fluids. Moreover, it demonstrated the relevance of <i>in vivo</i> data as well as the limitations of <i>in vitro</i> tools.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Pharmaceutics X
Published
2025-05-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpx.2025.100342
Primary Topic
Advanced Drug Delivery Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The effect of black tea and water temperature on the disintegration of gelatine and HPMC capsules, tested with the paddle device, GastroDuo and in vivo pharmacokinetics: Much ado about little

James Mann, Julius Krause, Theodora Tzakri, Mladen V. Tzvetkov et al.
International Journal of Pharmaceutics X
Advanced Drug Delivery Systems
article

The effect of black tea and water temperature on the disintegration of gelatine and HPMC capsules, tested with the paddle device, GastroDuo and in vivo pharmacokinetics: Much ado about little

James Mann, Julius Krause, Theodora Tzakri, Mladen V. Tzvetkov, Matthias Leyh, Werner Weitschies, Constantin Foja, Dorota Sarwinska, Philipp Schick, Michael Grimm, Felix Morof, Richard A. Barker
article en

Abstract

Fluid co-administered with oral medication directly affects its behaviour. Often, people use fluids other than water when taking their medications. Capsules (mainly gelatine- and HPMC-based) are widely used solid oral dosage forms. The presented study aimed to investigate the behaviour of gelatine and HPMC capsules in several fluids <i>in vitro</i> and <i>in vivo</i>. The second aim was to assess the influence of administered fluids on the gastric emptying. The third aim was to assess the usability and predictive power of different <i>in vitro</i> methods for drug analysis and compare them with <i>in vivo</i> data. For <i>in vitro</i> studies, two systems with different complexities were used: the compendial USP 2 apparatus and the GastroDuo biorelevant model. In both systems, 25 mL of SGF and 240 mL of tested fluid were used. To obtain the <i>in vivo</i> data, a clinical study with 12 young and healthy volunteers was performed. In this study, the salivary tracer technique, which utilises caffeine kinetics as a marker of a dosage form behaviour in the GIT, was used. <i>In vitro</i>, the temperature strongly affected the opening times of gelatine capsules (rapid opening in warm media and slower in cold). <i>In vivo</i>, the opening time of gelatine capsules in warm black tea was slightly delayed in comparison to warm water. The differences in opening times between warm and cold water and warm black tea and cold water were significant. In USP 2 Apparatus, HPMC capsules were more sensitive to the tested media than in the biorelevant GastroDuo model. There were no significant differences in the opening times of HPMC capsules <i>in vivo</i>. Gastric emptying of warm water, cold water or warm black tea was not affected, suggesting that the altered <i>in vivo</i> absorption kinetics was caused by the <i>in vivo</i> behaviour of the capsules, depending on their properties and not by changes in the gastric emptying of the co-administered fluids. The presented study allows a better understanding of gelatine and HPMC capsules behaviour <i>in vitro</i> and <i>in vivo</i> administered with different fluids. Moreover, it demonstrated the relevance of <i>in vivo</i> data as well as the limitations of <i>in vitro</i> tools.

International Journal of Pharmaceutics XVol. 9
AstraZeneca (United Kingdom) (GB), Universitätsmedizin Greifswald (DE), Universität Greifswald (DE)
Horizon 2020 Framework Programme, H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Advanced Drug Delivery Systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.