From Moo to Microbes: Pathways for precision fermentation in recombinant protein production

Meeting global protein demands amid climate change, land scarcity, and a projected population of nearly 10 billion by 2050 requires innovative, sustainable approaches. Traditional dairy and beef sectors contribute significantly to greenhouse gas emissions - dairy alone may emit up to 72 kg CO 2 eq per kilogram of milk protein. Precision fermentation (PF) has emerged as an alternative that harnesses genetically engineered microbes (e.g., Trichoderma reesei , yeasts) to produce animal-equivalent proteins, offering potential reductions in resource use and environmental impacts compared to livestock systems. This paper synthesizes existing life cycle assessments (LCAs), technical process data, and national agricultural statistics to compare PF-derived proteins - focusing on β-lactoglobulin (β‐LG) -to conventional dairy in Germany. Four scenarios are modeled: (1) reallocating the nation’s entire sugar production, (2) using only surplus sugar above Planetary Health Diet recommendations, (3) repurposing maize acreage, and (4) extracting sugar from grasslands. Feedstock requirements (sugar, ammonia, minerals) and energy inputs (electricity for fermentation) were combined to estimate per-kilogram land use for PF proteins under each scenario. Results were then benchmarked against dairy-based β‐LG, which has a land footprint of 19-68 m 2 /kg depending on allocation rules. Findings indicate that high-yield sugar crops (e.g., sugar beet, maize) or surplus sugar streams could feasibly produce substantial volumes of PF protein while limiting new land requirements. Grass-based feedstock is also viable, albeit with higher land footprints. Key challenges include ensuring green ammonia supplies, integrating renewable energy, and navigating socioeconomic trade-offs such as farm employment and nutrient cycling. Nonetheless, PF may complement or reduce reliance on traditional animal agriculture, particularly where grazing land or sugar surpluses can be redirected without compromising food security. Further research on feedstock optimization, techno-economic feasibility, and policy frameworks-such as incentives for “green” inputs-will be vital to accelerating PF’s contribution to a more sustainable protein supply. • PF offers a sustainable alternative to dairy for producing β‐lactoglobulin. • Integrated analysis evaluating sugar beet, maize and grassland as feedstocks shows competitive land-use efficiency. • Renewable inputs like green ammonia and solar energy improves land-use efficiency

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Agriculture and Food Research
Published
2025-05-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafr.2025.102056
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.42
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From Moo to Microbes: Pathways for precision fermentation in recombinant protein production

Özlem Özmutlu Karslioglu, Peter Breunig, Hanno Kossmann
3 citations
Journal of Agriculture and Food Research
Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction
2.42
article

From Moo to Microbes: Pathways for precision fermentation in recombinant protein production

Özlem Özmutlu Karslioglu, Peter Breunig, Hanno Kossmann
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Meeting global protein demands amid climate change, land scarcity, and a projected population of nearly 10 billion by 2050 requires innovative, sustainable approaches. Traditional dairy and beef sectors contribute significantly to greenhouse gas emissions - dairy alone may emit up to 72 kg CO 2 eq per kilogram of milk protein. Precision fermentation (PF) has emerged as an alternative that harnesses genetically engineered microbes (e.g., Trichoderma reesei , yeasts) to produce animal-equivalent proteins, offering potential reductions in resource use and environmental impacts compared to livestock systems. This paper synthesizes existing life cycle assessments (LCAs), technical process data, and national agricultural statistics to compare PF-derived proteins - focusing on β-lactoglobulin (β‐LG) -to conventional dairy in Germany. Four scenarios are modeled: (1) reallocating the nation’s entire sugar production, (2) using only surplus sugar above Planetary Health Diet recommendations, (3) repurposing maize acreage, and (4) extracting sugar from grasslands. Feedstock requirements (sugar, ammonia, minerals) and energy inputs (electricity for fermentation) were combined to estimate per-kilogram land use for PF proteins under each scenario. Results were then benchmarked against dairy-based β‐LG, which has a land footprint of 19-68 m 2 /kg depending on allocation rules. Findings indicate that high-yield sugar crops (e.g., sugar beet, maize) or surplus sugar streams could feasibly produce substantial volumes of PF protein while limiting new land requirements. Grass-based feedstock is also viable, albeit with higher land footprints. Key challenges include ensuring green ammonia supplies, integrating renewable energy, and navigating socioeconomic trade-offs such as farm employment and nutrient cycling. Nonetheless, PF may complement or reduce reliance on traditional animal agriculture, particularly where grazing land or sugar surpluses can be redirected without compromising food security. Further research on feedstock optimization, techno-economic feasibility, and policy frameworks-such as incentives for “green” inputs-will be vital to accelerating PF’s contribution to a more sustainable protein supply. • PF offers a sustainable alternative to dairy for producing β‐lactoglobulin. • Integrated analysis evaluating sugar beet, maize and grassland as feedstocks shows competitive land-use efficiency. • Renewable inputs like green ammonia and solar energy improves land-use efficiency

Journal of Agriculture and Food ResearchVol. 22
Weihenstephan-Triesdorf University of Applied Sciences (DE)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction
2.42
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.