Confusing Blood Group Antibodies in Obstetrics: Focus on the Risk of Hemolytic Disease of the Fetus and Newborn

During routine prenatal antibody screening, maternal reactivity is sometimes detected for which the clinical significance is unclear. As a result, the strategy for monitoring these antibodies during pregnancy, to mitigate the risk of hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN), may be uncertain. This review focuses on four such immune responses in obstetrics: anti-G, anti-M, warm reactive autoantibodies, and apparent nonspecific immune responses that cannot be further classified. The relationship of these antibodies to HDFN is a primary focus. Related concerns, including maternal and neonatal transfusion considerations and candidacy for Rh immune globulin, are also addressed. · Pregnant patients with anti-G who lack anti-D are candidates for Rh immune globulin.. · Anti-M is a rare cause of HDFN.. · Warm reactive autoantibodies in pregnancy are unlikely to be clinically significant..

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Perinatology
Published
2025-05-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2622-2841
Primary Topic
Blood groups and transfusion
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Confusing Blood Group Antibodies in Obstetrics: Focus on the Risk of Hemolytic Disease of the Fetus and Newborn

Douglas P. Blackall, Mark Tomlinson
American Journal of Perinatology
Blood groups and transfusion
article

Confusing Blood Group Antibodies in Obstetrics: Focus on the Risk of Hemolytic Disease of the Fetus and Newborn

Douglas P. Blackall, Mark Tomlinson
article en

Abstract

During routine prenatal antibody screening, maternal reactivity is sometimes detected for which the clinical significance is unclear. As a result, the strategy for monitoring these antibodies during pregnancy, to mitigate the risk of hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN), may be uncertain. This review focuses on four such immune responses in obstetrics: anti-G, anti-M, warm reactive autoantibodies, and apparent nonspecific immune responses that cannot be further classified. The relationship of these antibodies to HDFN is a primary focus. Related concerns, including maternal and neonatal transfusion considerations and candidacy for Rh immune globulin, are also addressed. · Pregnant patients with anti-G who lack anti-D are candidates for Rh immune globulin.. · Anti-M is a rare cause of HDFN.. · Warm reactive autoantibodies in pregnancy are unlikely to be clinically significant..

American Journal of PerinatologyVol. 43(02)
Providence Health & Services Oregon and Southwest Washington (US), Providence Health & Services (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Blood groups and transfusion
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.