Quantitative microbial risk assessment for drinking water intake threat prioritization: a comparison of vulnerability and threat assessment according to source water protection regulations of two Canadian provinces

• E. coli concentrations were simulated from CSO events • CSO-based QMRA analysis conducted for drinking water intakes • Log removal targets for pathogens calculated to meet daily health target • Frequency and severity of threats were integrated into an event-based risk assessment • CSO-based QMRA provides a quantitative framework for threat prioritization Source Water Protection in Canada is regulated primarily by provincial governments, leading to a variety of approaches for characterizing threats to drinking water. This paper compares the key elements of vulnerability and threat assessments for microbial contaminants for two Canadian provinces. Drinking water intakes of two municipalities in Quebec and Ontario, Canada, located on opposite sides of a large transboundary river impacted by Combined Sewer Overflow (CSO) discharges were used as a case study to evaluate the two provincial approaches. Québec’s vulnerability classification for microbial contaminants is data driven based on regulatory monitoring (concentrations of Escherichia coli ) at the drinking water intake) while that of Ontario’s is model driven and dependent on the physical and hydraulic characteristics of zones around an intake. To establish a quantitative criterion to compare these two threat assessment frameworks, the impacts of a series of CSO events upstream of the drinking water intakes were simulated using a calibrated hydrodynamic and water quality model. Corresponding enteric pathogen concentrations in the intakes were estimated and used as input for Quantitative Microbial Risk Assessment (QMRA) to calculate treatment requirement levels to meet human health targets. Unlike Ontario’s threat assessment approach, Quebec’s approach provides an opportunity to investigate the effectiveness of risk reduction strategies such as an adjustment of the frequency of CSO events or corrective actions to improve treatment. Considering the influence of CSO events on log removal requirements to remain compliant with human health targets permitted the differentiation of CSO risk levels for threat prioritization.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Challenges
Published
2025-05-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envc.2025.101193
Primary Topic
Fecal contamination and water quality
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quantitative microbial risk assessment for drinking water intake threat prioritization: a comparison of vulnerability and threat assessment according to source water protection regulations of two Canadian provinces

Raja Kammoun, Émile Sylvestre, Ahmad Shakibaeinia, Milad Taghipour et al.
Environmental Challenges
Fecal contamination and water quality
article

Quantitative microbial risk assessment for drinking water intake threat prioritization: a comparison of vulnerability and threat assessment according to source water protection regulations of two Canadian provinces

Raja Kammoun, Émile Sylvestre, Ahmad Shakibaeinia, Milad Taghipour, Michèle Prévost, Samira Tolouei, Sarah Dorner
article en

Abstract

• E. coli concentrations were simulated from CSO events • CSO-based QMRA analysis conducted for drinking water intakes • Log removal targets for pathogens calculated to meet daily health target • Frequency and severity of threats were integrated into an event-based risk assessment • CSO-based QMRA provides a quantitative framework for threat prioritization Source Water Protection in Canada is regulated primarily by provincial governments, leading to a variety of approaches for characterizing threats to drinking water. This paper compares the key elements of vulnerability and threat assessments for microbial contaminants for two Canadian provinces. Drinking water intakes of two municipalities in Quebec and Ontario, Canada, located on opposite sides of a large transboundary river impacted by Combined Sewer Overflow (CSO) discharges were used as a case study to evaluate the two provincial approaches. Québec’s vulnerability classification for microbial contaminants is data driven based on regulatory monitoring (concentrations of Escherichia coli ) at the drinking water intake) while that of Ontario’s is model driven and dependent on the physical and hydraulic characteristics of zones around an intake. To establish a quantitative criterion to compare these two threat assessment frameworks, the impacts of a series of CSO events upstream of the drinking water intakes were simulated using a calibrated hydrodynamic and water quality model. Corresponding enteric pathogen concentrations in the intakes were estimated and used as input for Quantitative Microbial Risk Assessment (QMRA) to calculate treatment requirement levels to meet human health targets. Unlike Ontario’s threat assessment approach, Quebec’s approach provides an opportunity to investigate the effectiveness of risk reduction strategies such as an adjustment of the frequency of CSO events or corrective actions to improve treatment. Considering the influence of CSO events on log removal requirements to remain compliant with human health targets permitted the differentiation of CSO risk levels for threat prioritization.

Environmental ChallengesVol. 20
Polytechnique Montréal (CA), Delft University of Technology (NL)
Canadian Water Network
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Fecal contamination and water quality
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.