Health-Related Gender Knowledge: Scale Development and Validation in Spanish Nursing Students

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> Gender bias in healthcare remains a persistent challenge, partly due to gaps in gender-related knowledge among professionals. While existing instruments assess gender sensitivity and gender-role ideology, there is a lack of generalizable tools specifically designed to evaluate gender-related health knowledge. This study aimed to develop and validate the Gender Knowledge Scale in a sample of 591 nursing students from the University of the Basque Country (Spain). <b>Methods:</b> The 10-item multiple-choice instrument was created using the Nominal Group Technique with a multidisciplinary panel of experts. <b>Results:</b> Psychometric analyses supported a unidimensional structure with acceptable fit indices (CFI = 0.928, RMSEA = 0.025), and items displayed a diverse range of difficulty levels. Knowledge scores were moderately correlated with gender sensitivity but not with gender-role ideology, suggesting that knowledge may influence attitudes but is insufficient to challenge entrenched stereotypes. Knowledge differences emerged across academic years, though not by gender. Misconceptions, particularly regarding menstruation, cardiovascular risk, and pain, were prevalent. <b>Conclusions:</b> The Gender Knowledge Scale is a practical and psychometrically sound tool for assessing gender-related health knowledge among nursing students. While further validation is needed in other populations, the scale may support educational interventions aimed at reducing gender bias in clinical care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nursing Reports
Published
2025-05-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/nursrep15060187
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Empathy and Medical Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.47

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Health-Related Gender Knowledge: Scale Development and Validation in Spanish Nursing Students

Olatz Goñi‐Balentziaga, Sara Prego‐Jimenez, Eva Pereda Pereda, Jone Aliri et al.
1 citations
Nursing Reports
Empathy and Medical Education
1.47
article

Health-Related Gender Knowledge: Scale Development and Validation in Spanish Nursing Students

Olatz Goñi‐Balentziaga, Sara Prego‐Jimenez, Eva Pereda Pereda, Jone Aliri, Ainitze Labaka
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> Gender bias in healthcare remains a persistent challenge, partly due to gaps in gender-related knowledge among professionals. While existing instruments assess gender sensitivity and gender-role ideology, there is a lack of generalizable tools specifically designed to evaluate gender-related health knowledge. This study aimed to develop and validate the Gender Knowledge Scale in a sample of 591 nursing students from the University of the Basque Country (Spain). <b>Methods:</b> The 10-item multiple-choice instrument was created using the Nominal Group Technique with a multidisciplinary panel of experts. <b>Results:</b> Psychometric analyses supported a unidimensional structure with acceptable fit indices (CFI = 0.928, RMSEA = 0.025), and items displayed a diverse range of difficulty levels. Knowledge scores were moderately correlated with gender sensitivity but not with gender-role ideology, suggesting that knowledge may influence attitudes but is insufficient to challenge entrenched stereotypes. Knowledge differences emerged across academic years, though not by gender. Misconceptions, particularly regarding menstruation, cardiovascular risk, and pain, were prevalent. <b>Conclusions:</b> The Gender Knowledge Scale is a practical and psychometrically sound tool for assessing gender-related health knowledge among nursing students. While further validation is needed in other populations, the scale may support educational interventions aimed at reducing gender bias in clinical care.

Nursing ReportsVol. 15(6)
University of the Basque Country (ES), Biogipuzkoa Health Research Institute (ES), Osakidetza (ES)
Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Empathy and Medical Education
1.47
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.