Factors associated with survival, recovery, and movements in the western Gulf Coast population of mottled ducks

Abstract The mottled duck ( Anas fulvigula ) is nonmigratory and a priority species for regional conservation and management because of its limited range and declining population trajectory in the western Gulf Coast (WGC) of Louisiana and Texas, USA. We developed multistate dead‐recovery models for banding and recovery data (1997–2020) to evaluate potential drivers of survival, recovery, and post‐summer movements for the WGC population of mottled ducks in Louisiana and Texas. Annual survival was most strongly associated with sex and year, with females having lower survival ( ± = 0.544 ± 0.114) than males (0.619 ± 0.062). Of the 32 environmental covariates tested, fall precipitation was the factor most strongly associated with survival. Conditional recovery probability (i.e., given mortality, the probability a bird had been shot by a hunter, retrieved, and had their band number reported) varied by sex, age, geographic state, and year, with juvenile males generally having highest conditional recovery (0.303 ± 0.072), followed by juvenile females (0.201 ± 0.100), adult males (0.156 ± 0.038), and adult females (0.095 ± 0.057). Estimates of harvest probabilities followed similar patterns as conditional recovery. Models containing effects of harvest regulations on conditional recovery were not competitive compared to models with general year effects; however, post hoc analyses suggested conditional recovery and harvest probabilities for adult and juvenile females decreased with the daily bag limit reduction in Louisiana and, for juvenile females, implementation of the 5‐day closure regulation in Texas. Post‐summer movement was substantially higher in the direction of Texas to Louisiana, decreased with distance to the Louisiana–Texas border, was higher for males than females, and varied with winter precipitation. These results contribute to a better understanding of the factors influencing demographic performance, harvest, and movement between states with differing harvest regulations and environmental pressures, which is important for mottled duck conservation planning. Wildlife managers can consider expanding banding effort throughout the full range of the WGC population and collecting and reporting live‐recapture data to allow for stronger population‐level inferences and increased power to detect differences in important demographic parameters at more refined spatial scales.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Wildlife Management
Published
2025-05-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jwmg.70038
Primary Topic
Animal Nutrition and Physiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Factors associated with survival, recovery, and movements in the western Gulf Coast population of mottled ducks

Kevin J. Kraai, Christopher P. Malachowski, William L. Kendall, Daniel P. Collins et al.
Journal of Wildlife Management
Animal Nutrition and Physiology
article

Factors associated with survival, recovery, and movements in the western Gulf Coast population of mottled ducks

Kevin J. Kraai, Christopher P. Malachowski, William L. Kendall, Daniel P. Collins, Larry A. Reynolds, Jason Olszak
article en

Abstract

Abstract The mottled duck ( Anas fulvigula ) is nonmigratory and a priority species for regional conservation and management because of its limited range and declining population trajectory in the western Gulf Coast (WGC) of Louisiana and Texas, USA. We developed multistate dead‐recovery models for banding and recovery data (1997–2020) to evaluate potential drivers of survival, recovery, and post‐summer movements for the WGC population of mottled ducks in Louisiana and Texas. Annual survival was most strongly associated with sex and year, with females having lower survival ( ± = 0.544 ± 0.114) than males (0.619 ± 0.062). Of the 32 environmental covariates tested, fall precipitation was the factor most strongly associated with survival. Conditional recovery probability (i.e., given mortality, the probability a bird had been shot by a hunter, retrieved, and had their band number reported) varied by sex, age, geographic state, and year, with juvenile males generally having highest conditional recovery (0.303 ± 0.072), followed by juvenile females (0.201 ± 0.100), adult males (0.156 ± 0.038), and adult females (0.095 ± 0.057). Estimates of harvest probabilities followed similar patterns as conditional recovery. Models containing effects of harvest regulations on conditional recovery were not competitive compared to models with general year effects; however, post hoc analyses suggested conditional recovery and harvest probabilities for adult and juvenile females decreased with the daily bag limit reduction in Louisiana and, for juvenile females, implementation of the 5‐day closure regulation in Texas. Post‐summer movement was substantially higher in the direction of Texas to Louisiana, decreased with distance to the Louisiana–Texas border, was higher for males than females, and varied with winter precipitation. These results contribute to a better understanding of the factors influencing demographic performance, harvest, and movement between states with differing harvest regulations and environmental pressures, which is important for mottled duck conservation planning. Wildlife managers can consider expanding banding effort throughout the full range of the WGC population and collecting and reporting live‐recapture data to allow for stronger population‐level inferences and increased power to detect differences in important demographic parameters at more refined spatial scales.

Journal of Wildlife ManagementVol. 89(6)
United States Geological Survey (US), Louisiana Department of Wildlife and Fisheries (US), Texas Parks and Wildlife Department (US), United States Fish and Wildlife Service (US), Colorado Parks and Wildlife (US), Colorado State University (US)
Texas Parks and Wildlife Department, Louisiana Department of Wildlife and Fisheries, Colorado State University, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, U.S. Geological Survey
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Animal Nutrition and Physiology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.