The European Transparency Requirement and the Inner Contradiction of General Terms and Conditions: Demonstration and Dissolution of a Conflict

Requirements of transparency lie at the core of the European General Terms and Conditions regulation. This it not only a legal policy decision. Rather, transparency is a necessary flipside to the instrument’s (sociologically speaking) unilateral mode of creation. At the same time, General Terms and Conditions are made for an unspecified number of addressees and cases. This nature collides with the need for transparency, as it for its part calls for more complex and thus less transparent formulations. The main question arising from this contradiction is as follows: What should be the appropriate standard of transparency in the General Terms and Conditions? This is directly linked to the solution of the conflict. For this, the approach of the jurisprudence is analysed and assessed. Ultimately, its restriction of transparency requirements by what is possible under the individual circumstances, will be affirmed, as it strikes an optimal balance between protecting the counterparty of the user of the General Terms and Conditions and allowing for effective and efficient transactions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Teisė
Published
2025-05-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.15388/teise.2025.134.10
Primary Topic
European and International Law Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The European Transparency Requirement and the Inner Contradiction of General Terms and Conditions: Demonstration and Dissolution of a Conflict

Mika Sharei
Teisė
European and International Law Studies
article

The European Transparency Requirement and the Inner Contradiction of General Terms and Conditions: Demonstration and Dissolution of a Conflict

Mika Sharei
article en

Abstract

Requirements of transparency lie at the core of the European General Terms and Conditions regulation. This it not only a legal policy decision. Rather, transparency is a necessary flipside to the instrument’s (sociologically speaking) unilateral mode of creation. At the same time, General Terms and Conditions are made for an unspecified number of addressees and cases. This nature collides with the need for transparency, as it for its part calls for more complex and thus less transparent formulations. The main question arising from this contradiction is as follows: What should be the appropriate standard of transparency in the General Terms and Conditions? This is directly linked to the solution of the conflict. For this, the approach of the jurisprudence is analysed and assessed. Ultimately, its restriction of transparency requirements by what is possible under the individual circumstances, will be affirmed, as it strikes an optimal balance between protecting the counterparty of the user of the General Terms and Conditions and allowing for effective and efficient transactions.

TeisėVol. 134
University of Konstanz (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
European and International Law Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The European Transparency Requirement and the Inner Contradiction of General Terms and Conditions: Demonstration and Dissolution of a Conflict — Mika Sharei · Teisė (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS