Data Assimilation of Solar‐Induced Chlorophyll Fluorescence Improves Gross Primary Production Simulation by a Process‐Based VISIT‐SIF Model in a Rice Paddy

Abstract Simulating gross primary production (GPP) is a key objective of terrestrial ecosystem models, and many studies have shown that solar‐induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF) is a reliable proxy for GPP. This study combines SIF data with a process‐based vegetation integrative simulator for trace gases (VISIT‐SIF) model to enhance GPP simulations in the Mase rice paddy field in Tsukuba, Japan. Using data assimilation techniques (Bayesian optimization) with both ground‐based SIF data and satellite‐derived SIF (CSIF) (both from 29 June 2019 to 10 September 2020), we optimized key model parameters and improved the simulation of GPP. Sensitivity analysis via SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) revealed that the maximum rate of carboxylation (Vcamx)‐related parameters significantly influence GPP, while the absorbed photosynthetically active radiation (APAR)‐related parameters are more critical for SIF modeling. Model optimization resulted in substantial performance improvements, particularly in simulating GPP at half‐hourly and daily scales. For half‐hourly results, the R 2 values of SIF improved from 0.37 to 0.60, and the relative error decreased from 124.21% to 63.39%, but the model went from underestimation to overestimation; for GPP, R 2 values improved from 0.47 to 0.68, relative error decreased from 150.00% to 47.85%, and the model's tendency to underestimate has been mitigated. At the daily scale, model simulations demonstrated higher R 2 values and lower relative errors than observations. Using the CSIF data set also improved the model but was less effective than densely measured ground SIF. Further, we explored the relationship between SIF and GPP on half‐hourly scale, daily scale, and weekly scale and found that the larger the time scale, the stronger the linear relationship of SIF‐GPP. Overall, using SIF as a proxy for GPP and optimizing key parameters through data assimilation significantly enhanced the simulation accuracy of the VISIT model. However, challenges remain, such as model biases under cloudy conditions and SIF overestimation during specific stages. This research demonstrates the value of assimilating SIF data into the VISIT model and highlights the potential of satellite‐derived SIF for improving GPP estimations, though at a small scale.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Geophysical Research Biogeosciences
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2024jg008280
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.21

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Data Assimilation of Solar‐Induced Chlorophyll Fluorescence Improves Gross Primary Production Simulation by a Process‐Based VISIT‐SIF Model in a Rice Paddy

Tomomichi Kato, Tomoki Morozumi, Kanokrat Buareal, Keisuke Ono et al.
2 citations
Journal of Geophysical Research Biogeosciences
Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
2.21
article

Data Assimilation of Solar‐Induced Chlorophyll Fluorescence Improves Gross Primary Production Simulation by a Process‐Based VISIT‐SIF Model in a Rice Paddy

Tomomichi Kato, Tomoki Morozumi, Kanokrat Buareal, Keisuke Ono, Tatsuya Miyauchi, Lixangxin Fan
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract Simulating gross primary production (GPP) is a key objective of terrestrial ecosystem models, and many studies have shown that solar‐induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF) is a reliable proxy for GPP. This study combines SIF data with a process‐based vegetation integrative simulator for trace gases (VISIT‐SIF) model to enhance GPP simulations in the Mase rice paddy field in Tsukuba, Japan. Using data assimilation techniques (Bayesian optimization) with both ground‐based SIF data and satellite‐derived SIF (CSIF) (both from 29 June 2019 to 10 September 2020), we optimized key model parameters and improved the simulation of GPP. Sensitivity analysis via SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) revealed that the maximum rate of carboxylation (Vcamx)‐related parameters significantly influence GPP, while the absorbed photosynthetically active radiation (APAR)‐related parameters are more critical for SIF modeling. Model optimization resulted in substantial performance improvements, particularly in simulating GPP at half‐hourly and daily scales. For half‐hourly results, the R 2 values of SIF improved from 0.37 to 0.60, and the relative error decreased from 124.21% to 63.39%, but the model went from underestimation to overestimation; for GPP, R 2 values improved from 0.47 to 0.68, relative error decreased from 150.00% to 47.85%, and the model's tendency to underestimate has been mitigated. At the daily scale, model simulations demonstrated higher R 2 values and lower relative errors than observations. Using the CSIF data set also improved the model but was less effective than densely measured ground SIF. Further, we explored the relationship between SIF and GPP on half‐hourly scale, daily scale, and weekly scale and found that the larger the time scale, the stronger the linear relationship of SIF‐GPP. Overall, using SIF as a proxy for GPP and optimizing key parameters through data assimilation significantly enhanced the simulation accuracy of the VISIT model. However, challenges remain, such as model biases under cloudy conditions and SIF overestimation during specific stages. This research demonstrates the value of assimilating SIF data into the VISIT model and highlights the potential of satellite‐derived SIF for improving GPP estimations, though at a small scale.

Journal of Geophysical Research BiogeosciencesVol. 130(5)
National Agriculture and Food Research Organization (JP), National Institute for Environmental Studies (JP), Hokkaido University (JP)
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, Japan Science and Technology Agency
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
2.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.