Automated phase segmentation with quantifiable sensitivities of three-phase microstructures of solid oxide cell electrodes

Microstructures control the properties of materials and their performance in applications, including solid oxide cell (SOC) electrodes. Direct calculation of microstructural parameters from 2D or 3D images requires phase segmentation of experimental greyscale data. Subtle differences in segmentation outcomes can lead to significant differences in calculated microstructure parameters, especially for higher-order ones such as triple phase boundary (TPB) density. Unfortunately, it is nearly impossible to reproduce published segmentation results and their uncertainties are difficult to assess. We present a modification to typical watershed segmentation that addresses these issues. Markers are first placed based on the gradient distribution, using a single threshold parameter, and then grown by watershed to generate a marker segmented image. Phase-labeling is readily carried out from a post-watershed marker averaged greyscale distribution, using two threshold parameters. Sequentially performing these steps and simplifying the methods to determine the optimal values of the three threshold parameters enables the process to be automated and readily reproduced. With this new method, common segmentation errors can be avoided and sensitivity of computed microstructural properties around the optimal threshold values can be assessed. The method is applied to several large-scale 3D SOC electrode datasets, and the outputs are compared to published values. • Segmentation of a three-phase microstructure from 3D greyscale data was automated. • Phase and region identification are separated and use different data and methods. • Three threshold parameters are identified and optimized to remove user involvement. • Improper phase-IDs and resultant erroneous triple phase boundaries are reduced. • Quantitative sensitivity analysis of the output to the threshold parameters is done.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Materials Characterization
Published
2025-05-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchar.2025.115201
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.24
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Automated phase segmentation with quantifiable sensitivities of three-phase microstructures of solid oxide cell electrodes

Harry Abernathy, A. Salvador, William K. Epting, William F. Kent
1 citations
Materials Characterization
Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection
1.24
article

Automated phase segmentation with quantifiable sensitivities of three-phase microstructures of solid oxide cell electrodes

Harry Abernathy, A. Salvador, William K. Epting, William F. Kent
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Microstructures control the properties of materials and their performance in applications, including solid oxide cell (SOC) electrodes. Direct calculation of microstructural parameters from 2D or 3D images requires phase segmentation of experimental greyscale data. Subtle differences in segmentation outcomes can lead to significant differences in calculated microstructure parameters, especially for higher-order ones such as triple phase boundary (TPB) density. Unfortunately, it is nearly impossible to reproduce published segmentation results and their uncertainties are difficult to assess. We present a modification to typical watershed segmentation that addresses these issues. Markers are first placed based on the gradient distribution, using a single threshold parameter, and then grown by watershed to generate a marker segmented image. Phase-labeling is readily carried out from a post-watershed marker averaged greyscale distribution, using two threshold parameters. Sequentially performing these steps and simplifying the methods to determine the optimal values of the three threshold parameters enables the process to be automated and readily reproduced. With this new method, common segmentation errors can be avoided and sensitivity of computed microstructural properties around the optimal threshold values can be assessed. The method is applied to several large-scale 3D SOC electrode datasets, and the outputs are compared to published values. • Segmentation of a three-phase microstructure from 3D greyscale data was automated. • Phase and region identification are separated and use different data and methods. • Three threshold parameters are identified and optimized to remove user involvement. • Improper phase-IDs and resultant erroneous triple phase boundaries are reduced. • Quantitative sensitivity analysis of the output to the threshold parameters is done.

Materials CharacterizationVol. 226
Leidos (United States) (US), National Energy Technology Laboratory (US), Office of Fossil Energy (US), Carnegie Mellon University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection
1.24
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.