Trade and FDI effects in Eurasia: the cases of RCEP and EAEU

Abstract Subject and purpose of work The overview of trade and FDI effects in 2019-2023 in two biggest integration communities of Eurasia: Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) with 15 members (including ASEAN) and Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) with 5 countries (including Russia). Materials and methods The analysis of export, import, and trade balances showed asymmetric trade effects for the RCEP-countries that are focused on regional, intraregional, extra regional trade. Results It’s proved that the signing of RCEP agreement raised attractiveness of the region for the FDI. In its contrast, the EAEU has refocused its trade effects on mutual trade with the significant role of Russia as the main FDI investor due to the decoupling from the West. Conclusions The difference in economic scale and political effects between RCEP & EAEU reflects different motivation and the barriers for bilateral trade and investment cooperation in the future.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Economic and Regional Studies / Studia Ekonomiczne i Regionalne
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2478/ers-2025-0006
Primary Topic
Global Political and Economic Relations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Trade and FDI effects in Eurasia: the cases of RCEP and EAEU

A. N. Petrushkevich, Kiryl Rudy
Economic and Regional Studies / Studia Ekonomiczne i Regionalne
Global Political and Economic Relations
article

Trade and FDI effects in Eurasia: the cases of RCEP and EAEU

A. N. Petrushkevich, Kiryl Rudy
article en

Abstract

Abstract Subject and purpose of work The overview of trade and FDI effects in 2019-2023 in two biggest integration communities of Eurasia: Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) with 15 members (including ASEAN) and Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) with 5 countries (including Russia). Materials and methods The analysis of export, import, and trade balances showed asymmetric trade effects for the RCEP-countries that are focused on regional, intraregional, extra regional trade. Results It’s proved that the signing of RCEP agreement raised attractiveness of the region for the FDI. In its contrast, the EAEU has refocused its trade effects on mutual trade with the significant role of Russia as the main FDI investor due to the decoupling from the West. Conclusions The difference in economic scale and political effects between RCEP & EAEU reflects different motivation and the barriers for bilateral trade and investment cooperation in the future.

Economic and Regional Studies / Studia Ekonomiczne i RegionalneVol. 18(1)
Belarusian State Economic University (BY)
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Global Political and Economic Relations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.