Role of Complete (Full) Rockall Scoring in Management of Upper Gastrointestinal Tract Bleeding

Background: Risk stratification in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding is very important for proper management. Rockall score is the most used scoring systems in this regards. Aims: to evaluate the Rockall scoring system as predictor of prognosis and mortality and accordingly management done in patients with upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding. Patients and Methods: This prospective study included 150 adult patients with upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding and underwent endoscopy. Demographic data- age, sex, presentation with hematochezia, and history of upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding, and comorbidities were recorded in a predesigned proforma. The Rockall Score was calculated according to standard protocol. The outcomes were measured in terms of need for medical ward, need for surgery and mortality were recorded 4 weeks after procedure. Receiver operating characteristic was used to evaluate the predicative value of Rockall score in predicting different outcomes (sensitivity and specificity of score). Results: Most patients (92, 61.13%) required medical ward admission, while the minority of patients (10, 6.67%) required surgical ward admission, 25 patients (16,67%) discharged home well, and 23 patients (13.33%) died. For predicting medical ward admission, the area under the curve was 0.803, 95%CI= 0.714-0.892. The sensitivity and specificity of the test at cut off value of Rockall score= 2 was 77% and 56%, respectively. For predicting surgical admission, the area under the curve was 0.927, 95%CI= 0.855-0.999. The sensitivity and specificity of the test at cut off value of Rockall score= 4 was 83% and 84%, respectively. For predicting mortality, the area under the curve was 0.982, 95%CI= 0.947-1.0. The sensitivity and specificity of the test at cut off value of Rockall score= 5 was 90% and 96%, respectively. Conclusions: The Rockall Score system is an appropriate predictor of mortality in patients with upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding. The cut-off point for predicting surgical admission and mortality was 4 and 5, respectively. However, it is not appropriate predictor for medical admission.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Pharmaceutical and Bio-Medical Science
Published
2025-05-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.47191/ijpbms/v5-i5-08
Primary Topic
Gastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Role of Complete (Full) Rockall Scoring in Management of Upper Gastrointestinal Tract Bleeding

Dr Osama Mahmoud tuama, Dr Sabah Noori Abdulraheem AlKhazaali, Dr Ahmed A. Ibraheem
International Journal of Pharmaceutical and Bio-Medical Science
Gastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Role of Complete (Full) Rockall Scoring in Management of Upper Gastrointestinal Tract Bleeding

Dr Osama Mahmoud tuama, Dr Sabah Noori Abdulraheem AlKhazaali, Dr Ahmed A. Ibraheem
article en

Abstract

Background: Risk stratification in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding is very important for proper management. Rockall score is the most used scoring systems in this regards. Aims: to evaluate the Rockall scoring system as predictor of prognosis and mortality and accordingly management done in patients with upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding. Patients and Methods: This prospective study included 150 adult patients with upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding and underwent endoscopy. Demographic data- age, sex, presentation with hematochezia, and history of upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding, and comorbidities were recorded in a predesigned proforma. The Rockall Score was calculated according to standard protocol. The outcomes were measured in terms of need for medical ward, need for surgery and mortality were recorded 4 weeks after procedure. Receiver operating characteristic was used to evaluate the predicative value of Rockall score in predicting different outcomes (sensitivity and specificity of score). Results: Most patients (92, 61.13%) required medical ward admission, while the minority of patients (10, 6.67%) required surgical ward admission, 25 patients (16,67%) discharged home well, and 23 patients (13.33%) died. For predicting medical ward admission, the area under the curve was 0.803, 95%CI= 0.714-0.892. The sensitivity and specificity of the test at cut off value of Rockall score= 2 was 77% and 56%, respectively. For predicting surgical admission, the area under the curve was 0.927, 95%CI= 0.855-0.999. The sensitivity and specificity of the test at cut off value of Rockall score= 4 was 83% and 84%, respectively. For predicting mortality, the area under the curve was 0.982, 95%CI= 0.947-1.0. The sensitivity and specificity of the test at cut off value of Rockall score= 5 was 90% and 96%, respectively. Conclusions: The Rockall Score system is an appropriate predictor of mortality in patients with upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding. The cut-off point for predicting surgical admission and mortality was 4 and 5, respectively. However, it is not appropriate predictor for medical admission.

International Journal of Pharmaceutical and Bio-Medical ScienceVol. 05(05)
Baghdad Medical City (IQ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Gastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.