The Modification of the Probation Period as an Effect of Transposing the Directive (EU) 2019/1152 in the Romanian Law

Abstract Directive 2019/1152 has brought to the forefront the importance of the probationary period in an employment relationship, by its dual importance both in the activity of an enterprise by enabling the employer to find workers as competent as possible for the performance of the activity, and for the worker, who has the opportunity to know from the beginning of the employment relationship what conditions he must fulfill. Law no. 283/2022 amended the national law in the sense that it made it mandatory to expressly mention the conditions of the probationary period, if any, thus creating a conflict between the existing rules, in relation to the fact that during the probationary period, there is the possibility of termination of the individual employment contract by a simple unjustified notification by either party. In the following study, we will try to solve the legal problem of whether there or there is not a change in the legislator’s optics regarding the reasons for the termination of the individual employment contract during the probationary period.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Legal Studies
Published
2025-05-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2478/jles-2025-0007
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Government, Law, and Information Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
15.98
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Modification of the Probation Period as an Effect of Transposing the Directive (EU) 2019/1152 in the Romanian Law

Gabriela-Petruța Știrbu, Nicolae Radu Stoian
1 citations
Journal of Legal Studies
Government, Law, and Information Management
15.98
article

The Modification of the Probation Period as an Effect of Transposing the Directive (EU) 2019/1152 in the Romanian Law

Gabriela-Petruța Știrbu, Nicolae Radu Stoian
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Directive 2019/1152 has brought to the forefront the importance of the probationary period in an employment relationship, by its dual importance both in the activity of an enterprise by enabling the employer to find workers as competent as possible for the performance of the activity, and for the worker, who has the opportunity to know from the beginning of the employment relationship what conditions he must fulfill. Law no. 283/2022 amended the national law in the sense that it made it mandatory to expressly mention the conditions of the probationary period, if any, thus creating a conflict between the existing rules, in relation to the fact that during the probationary period, there is the possibility of termination of the individual employment contract by a simple unjustified notification by either party. In the following study, we will try to solve the legal problem of whether there or there is not a change in the legislator’s optics regarding the reasons for the termination of the individual employment contract during the probationary period.

Journal of Legal StudiesVol. 35(49)
Vasile Goldis Western University of Arad (RO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Government, Law, and Information Management
15.98
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Modification of the Probation Period as an Effect of Transposing the Directive (EU) 2019/1152 in the Romanian Law — Gabriela-Petruța Știrbu, Nicolae Radu Stoian · Journal of Legal Studies (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS