The Evaluation of Noise Annoyance in a Tertiary Care Hospital

Abstract Aims: The aim of this study was the analysis of the relation between noise annoyance and the other sound indicators including speech interference level (SIL), preferred noise criterion (PNC), and sound pressure level (SPL) utilizing demographic variants (age, sex, marital status, and education) at the hospital. Methods: In this research, SPL was studied in the intensive care unit (ICU) and emergency department of Isfahan’s Al-Zahra Hospital. Sound Level Meter (SLM) was undertaken according to ISO 9612 within the designated stations, followed by determining the SIL and PNC indicators. The questionnaire about noise annoyance and demographic variants was simultaneously filled out by 60 individuals. Eventually, the relationships between objective indicators with noise annoyance and also objective indicators with age variable were obtained by Pearson’s correlation test, using SPSS version 16 and Excel software. Results: The results showed that the average indicators of SPL, PNC, and SIL with the values of 61.82, 51.03, and 70.79, respectively, were more than the respective standards. In addition, the results of analyzing noise annoyance showed that the mean and standard deviation of this parameter equals to 60.54 ± 1.43, which demonstrates the extreme rate of this scale. The Pearson’s correlation test did not show any meaningful relation among noise annoyance and the indicators SPL, SIL, and PNC. However, a meaningful relation was found between the SIL and PNC indicators ( P < 0.005). Conclusions: Considering the findings, an average of all acoustic indicators studied in the ICU and emergency departments of the hospital are more than the national standards. Furthermore, the scale of noise annoyance in the severe rating indicates that people in the hospital environment are affected by noise and are harassed. Based on this, it seems necessary to plan and adopt managerial and technical-engineering measures to reduce the level of noise pollution to the permitted limits of the standard.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Environmental Health Engineering
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4103/ijehe.ijehe_32_22
Primary Topic
Noise Effects and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Evaluation of Noise Annoyance in a Tertiary Care Hospital

Siamak Pourabdian, Hadi Asady, Mojtaba Nakhaei pour, Farhad Forouharmajd et al.
International Journal of Environmental Health Engineering
Noise Effects and Management
article

The Evaluation of Noise Annoyance in a Tertiary Care Hospital

Siamak Pourabdian, Hadi Asady, Mojtaba Nakhaei pour, Farhad Forouharmajd, Mostafa Asady Saadatlo
article en

Abstract

Abstract Aims: The aim of this study was the analysis of the relation between noise annoyance and the other sound indicators including speech interference level (SIL), preferred noise criterion (PNC), and sound pressure level (SPL) utilizing demographic variants (age, sex, marital status, and education) at the hospital. Methods: In this research, SPL was studied in the intensive care unit (ICU) and emergency department of Isfahan’s Al-Zahra Hospital. Sound Level Meter (SLM) was undertaken according to ISO 9612 within the designated stations, followed by determining the SIL and PNC indicators. The questionnaire about noise annoyance and demographic variants was simultaneously filled out by 60 individuals. Eventually, the relationships between objective indicators with noise annoyance and also objective indicators with age variable were obtained by Pearson’s correlation test, using SPSS version 16 and Excel software. Results: The results showed that the average indicators of SPL, PNC, and SIL with the values of 61.82, 51.03, and 70.79, respectively, were more than the respective standards. In addition, the results of analyzing noise annoyance showed that the mean and standard deviation of this parameter equals to 60.54 ± 1.43, which demonstrates the extreme rate of this scale. The Pearson’s correlation test did not show any meaningful relation among noise annoyance and the indicators SPL, SIL, and PNC. However, a meaningful relation was found between the SIL and PNC indicators ( P < 0.005). Conclusions: Considering the findings, an average of all acoustic indicators studied in the ICU and emergency departments of the hospital are more than the national standards. Furthermore, the scale of noise annoyance in the severe rating indicates that people in the hospital environment are affected by noise and are harassed. Based on this, it seems necessary to plan and adopt managerial and technical-engineering measures to reduce the level of noise pollution to the permitted limits of the standard.

International Journal of Environmental Health EngineeringVol. 14(2)
Isfahan University of Medical Sciences (IR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Noise Effects and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.