In‐group bias in preferences for redistribution: a survey experiment in Italy

Abstract Using a new survey and experimental data, we investigate how information on inequality and immigration affects preferences for redistribution in Italy. Our analysis addresses both the economic and cultural dimensions of immigration, showing that, in general, preferences for redistribution are inelastic to new information. However, we find that providing information about the native–immigrant composition of poverty reduces exclusionary redistributive preferences. Specifically, when respondents learn that poverty among natives is lower than they had previously believed, they are less likely to prioritize natives and exclude immigrants from receiving welfare benefits. This provides evidence of an economic in‐group bias in redistribution preferences. Heterogeneous treatment effects also reveal the presence of a cultural in‐group bias among certain sociodemographic groups.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Economica
Published
2025-05-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/ecca.12584
Primary Topic
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

In‐group bias in preferences for redistribution: a survey experiment in Italy

Riccardo Bruni, Alessandro Gioffré, Maria Rosaria Marino
Economica
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
article

In‐group bias in preferences for redistribution: a survey experiment in Italy

Riccardo Bruni, Alessandro Gioffré, Maria Rosaria Marino
article en

Abstract

Abstract Using a new survey and experimental data, we investigate how information on inequality and immigration affects preferences for redistribution in Italy. Our analysis addresses both the economic and cultural dimensions of immigration, showing that, in general, preferences for redistribution are inelastic to new information. However, we find that providing information about the native–immigrant composition of poverty reduces exclusionary redistributive preferences. Specifically, when respondents learn that poverty among natives is lower than they had previously believed, they are less likely to prioritize natives and exclude immigrants from receiving welfare benefits. This provides evidence of an economic in‐group bias in redistribution preferences. Heterogeneous treatment effects also reveal the presence of a cultural in‐group bias among certain sociodemographic groups.

EconomicaVol. 92(367)
University of Florence (IT), Universitat de Barcelona (ES)
Generalitat de Catalunya, Università degli Studi di Firenze, Horizon 2020 Framework Programme
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.