Patient satisfaction with long-acting injectable buprenorphine: What needs to be measured from the patient’s perspective?

Background<br/>Long-acting injectable buprenorphine is an effective treatment for opioid use disorder. This paper asks: 1. How satisfied are people with long-acting injectable buprenorphine during their first year of treatment? 2. How do people receiving long-acting injectable buprenorphine assess treatment satisfaction/dissatisfaction? 3. Does long-acting injectable buprenorphine require its own specific satisfaction measure?<br/><br/>Methods<br/>Semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with 26 people receiving long-acting injectable buprenorphine. Participants were recruited from community drug treatment services in England and Wales. Data were transcribed, coded, and analyzed via Iterative Categorization.<br/><br/>Results<br/>Patient satisfaction was high and constituted through six domains: 1. Global satisfaction (overall satisfaction, preferred medication); 2. Medication features (dose, injection, knowing what to expect, availability); 3. Effects on substance use (drug consumption, withdrawal symptoms); 4. Effects on substance use treatment (not having to attend services daily, support provided by services); 5. Effects on the self (physical changes, psychological impact); 6. Effects on daily life (employment/studying, interest in other activities, relationships, material possessions, no acquisitive crime).<br/><br/>Conclusions<br/>Satisfaction is a multifaceted construct extending beyond long-acting injectable buprenorphine’s pharmacological properties and encompassing wider life areas. Further research is needed to develop a specific satisfaction measure, but adaptations to clinical practice may improve satisfaction meantime.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Drugs Education Prevention and Policy
Published
2025-05-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/09687637.2025.2506415
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.88
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Patient satisfaction with long-acting injectable buprenorphine: What needs to be measured from the patient’s perspective?

James Cassidy, Joanne Neale, John Strang, Sarah Cosgrove
1 citations
Drugs Education Prevention and Policy
Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
1.88
article

Patient satisfaction with long-acting injectable buprenorphine: What needs to be measured from the patient’s perspective?

James Cassidy, Joanne Neale, John Strang, Sarah Cosgrove
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Background<br/>Long-acting injectable buprenorphine is an effective treatment for opioid use disorder. This paper asks: 1. How satisfied are people with long-acting injectable buprenorphine during their first year of treatment? 2. How do people receiving long-acting injectable buprenorphine assess treatment satisfaction/dissatisfaction? 3. Does long-acting injectable buprenorphine require its own specific satisfaction measure?<br/><br/>Methods<br/>Semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with 26 people receiving long-acting injectable buprenorphine. Participants were recruited from community drug treatment services in England and Wales. Data were transcribed, coded, and analyzed via Iterative Categorization.<br/><br/>Results<br/>Patient satisfaction was high and constituted through six domains: 1. Global satisfaction (overall satisfaction, preferred medication); 2. Medication features (dose, injection, knowing what to expect, availability); 3. Effects on substance use (drug consumption, withdrawal symptoms); 4. Effects on substance use treatment (not having to attend services daily, support provided by services); 5. Effects on the self (physical changes, psychological impact); 6. Effects on daily life (employment/studying, interest in other activities, relationships, material possessions, no acquisitive crime).<br/><br/>Conclusions<br/>Satisfaction is a multifaceted construct extending beyond long-acting injectable buprenorphine’s pharmacological properties and encompassing wider life areas. Further research is needed to develop a specific satisfaction measure, but adaptations to clinical practice may improve satisfaction meantime.

Drugs Education Prevention and PolicyVol. 33(2)
King's College London (GB), South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust (GB), UNSW Sydney (AU), Maudsley Hospital (GB)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
1.88
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.