Different city = different cycling behaviour? A comparative analysis of cycling behaviour in German cities

Abstract To promote cycling through effective measures, a thorough understanding of cycling behaviour is essential. Researchers and practitioners assume that cycling behaviour, including riding behaviour and route choice, varies across cities. However, there is limited knowledge about these variations, their similarities, and the underlying causes. This article presents the results of a comprehensive analysis comparing riding behaviour and route choice preferences across six German cities. The analysis is based on a large GPS dataset comprising over 200,000 trips. The study reveals notable differences in riding behaviour and route choices between the cities, alongside several shared patterns. These differences may be influenced by urban characteristics such as city size and topography, while the similarities could be attributed to general preferences, attitudes, and adaptive behaviours. The findings provide valuable insights into cyclists' behaviour, enabling cities and municipalities to prioritize cycling promotion more effectively. In some cases, they may also support the implementation and adoption of more generalized strategies. Additionally, the study contributes to the development of city-specific models for predicting cycling demand, optimizing infrastructure, and ensuring the efficient resource allocation for improved network planning.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Transport Research Review
Published
2025-05-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12544-025-00723-y
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Urban Transport and Accessibility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.53

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Different city = different cycling behaviour? A comparative analysis of cycling behaviour in German cities

Stefan Huber, Sven Lißner, Paul Lindemann, Katrin Lubashevsky
3 citations
European Transport Research Review
Urban Transport and Accessibility
6.53
article

Different city = different cycling behaviour? A comparative analysis of cycling behaviour in German cities

Stefan Huber, Sven Lißner, Paul Lindemann, Katrin Lubashevsky
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract To promote cycling through effective measures, a thorough understanding of cycling behaviour is essential. Researchers and practitioners assume that cycling behaviour, including riding behaviour and route choice, varies across cities. However, there is limited knowledge about these variations, their similarities, and the underlying causes. This article presents the results of a comprehensive analysis comparing riding behaviour and route choice preferences across six German cities. The analysis is based on a large GPS dataset comprising over 200,000 trips. The study reveals notable differences in riding behaviour and route choices between the cities, alongside several shared patterns. These differences may be influenced by urban characteristics such as city size and topography, while the similarities could be attributed to general preferences, attitudes, and adaptive behaviours. The findings provide valuable insights into cyclists' behaviour, enabling cities and municipalities to prioritize cycling promotion more effectively. In some cases, they may also support the implementation and adoption of more generalized strategies. Additionally, the study contributes to the development of city-specific models for predicting cycling demand, optimizing infrastructure, and ensuring the efficient resource allocation for improved network planning.

European Transport Research ReviewVol. 17(1)
Vocational College of Traffic and Transport (SI), Center for Systems Biology Dresden (DE)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Technische Universität Dresden
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Urban Transport and Accessibility
6.53
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.