Buy-Online-Pick-Up-At-Store Benefits Supply Chains Considering Supplier Encroachment

Buy-online-pick-up-at-store (BOPS) is a prevalent strategy in omnichannel retailing. It is widely adopted by retailers, such as Target and Walmart, to attract customers via providing real-time information on product inventory and instant in-store pickup. This strategy is distinguished by its integration of online and offline channels, offering an exclusive service when compared to suppliers who operate solely online. Intuitively, BOPS enhances the competitive advantage of retailers, thereby countering suppliers’ encroachment in retailers’ online markets. However, our research provides the opposite results. We study the impact of BOPS on supplier encroachment by investigating a two-echelon supply chain involving a retailer considering BOPS implementation and a supplier contemplating online encroachment. Our research reveals that BOPS does not always prevent supplier encroachment; instead, it may trigger it. This occurs because the introduction of BOPS attracts customers who previously encountered stockout in physical stores, encouraging them to switch to the supplier’s online channel. This migration prompts the retailer to increase their fulfillment rate to better compete, which subsequently elevates the wholesale profit and benefits the supplier. Moreover, we explore five extensive models, including customer return, store-only customers, endogenous wholesale price, endogenous retail prices and cross-selling effect, with the results indicating that BOPS consistently facilitates supplier encroachment across all scenarios. In conclusion, our research suggests that BOPS might not be a prudent choice since it not only attracts supplier encroachment but also hurts retailers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Production and Operations Management
Published
2025-05-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10591478251342693
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Supply Chain and Inventory Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.14

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Buy-Online-Pick-Up-At-Store Benefits Supply Chains Considering Supplier Encroachment

Yudi Zhang, Chun‐Hung Chiu, Hang Xie, Shihao Huang
4 citations
Production and Operations Management
Supply Chain and Inventory Management
9.14
article

Buy-Online-Pick-Up-At-Store Benefits Supply Chains Considering Supplier Encroachment

Yudi Zhang, Chun‐Hung Chiu, Hang Xie, Shihao Huang
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Buy-online-pick-up-at-store (BOPS) is a prevalent strategy in omnichannel retailing. It is widely adopted by retailers, such as Target and Walmart, to attract customers via providing real-time information on product inventory and instant in-store pickup. This strategy is distinguished by its integration of online and offline channels, offering an exclusive service when compared to suppliers who operate solely online. Intuitively, BOPS enhances the competitive advantage of retailers, thereby countering suppliers’ encroachment in retailers’ online markets. However, our research provides the opposite results. We study the impact of BOPS on supplier encroachment by investigating a two-echelon supply chain involving a retailer considering BOPS implementation and a supplier contemplating online encroachment. Our research reveals that BOPS does not always prevent supplier encroachment; instead, it may trigger it. This occurs because the introduction of BOPS attracts customers who previously encountered stockout in physical stores, encouraging them to switch to the supplier’s online channel. This migration prompts the retailer to increase their fulfillment rate to better compete, which subsequently elevates the wholesale profit and benefits the supplier. Moreover, we explore five extensive models, including customer return, store-only customers, endogenous wholesale price, endogenous retail prices and cross-selling effect, with the results indicating that BOPS consistently facilitates supplier encroachment across all scenarios. In conclusion, our research suggests that BOPS might not be a prudent choice since it not only attracts supplier encroachment but also hurts retailers.

Production and Operations ManagementVol. 34(11)
University of Liverpool (GB), Sun Yat-sen University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Supply Chain and Inventory Management
9.14
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.