The Human Rights Project and the Limits of Cosmopolitan Rights

This essay argues for a critical reconsideration of cosmopolitan human rights and of the post-Cold War Human Rights Project. It begins by contextualizing cosmopolitan rights in their historical and ideological context, showing that they are deeply complicit in a broader regime of neoliberal global governance, helping to justify and to depoliticize new modalities of coercive conditionality that characterize that regime. It shows how specific features of cosmopolitan rights contribute directly to this form of indirect rule and opines that present indifference or hostility toward human rights can and should be understood in part as a product of this complicity and of the wider failures of neoliberal global governance. The essay concludes with some reflections on the study of backlash against human rights amidst the real threat of rising ethno-nationalism and fascistic politics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
De Ethica A Journal of Philosophical Theological and Applied Ethics
Published
2025-05-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3384/de-ethica.2001-8819.25914
Primary Topic
Human Rights and Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Human Rights Project and the Limits of Cosmopolitan Rights

Michael Goodhart
De Ethica A Journal of Philosophical Theological and Applied Ethics
Human Rights and Development
article

The Human Rights Project and the Limits of Cosmopolitan Rights

Michael Goodhart
article en

Abstract

This essay argues for a critical reconsideration of cosmopolitan human rights and of the post-Cold War Human Rights Project. It begins by contextualizing cosmopolitan rights in their historical and ideological context, showing that they are deeply complicit in a broader regime of neoliberal global governance, helping to justify and to depoliticize new modalities of coercive conditionality that characterize that regime. It shows how specific features of cosmopolitan rights contribute directly to this form of indirect rule and opines that present indifference or hostility toward human rights can and should be understood in part as a product of this complicity and of the wider failures of neoliberal global governance. The essay concludes with some reflections on the study of backlash against human rights amidst the real threat of rising ethno-nationalism and fascistic politics.

De Ethica A Journal of Philosophical Theological and Applied EthicsVol. 9(1)
University of Pittsburgh (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Human Rights and Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Human Rights Project and the Limits of Cosmopolitan Rights — Michael Goodhart · De Ethica A Journal of Philosophical Theological and Applied Ethics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS