Comparison of seven machine learning models in hypertension classification using photoplethysmographic and anthropometric data

This study presents an algorithm for classifying individuals into four hypertension categories (healthy, prehypertension, Stage 1, and Stage 2) using indices computed from photoplethysmographic (PPG) and anthropometric data. The dataset includes 219 individuals (115 women, 104 men, ages 21-86), with resting PPG signals, body mass index (BMI), age, weight, height, and resting heart rate. Key features (PPGAI, Ab, and Ad indices) were computed from the PPG signal. After dimensionality reduction through stepwise linear regression, the most informative predictors of hypertensive stages were identified for model training. Seven machine learning models, including Support Vector Machine (SVM), K-Nearest Neighbours, Logistic Regression, Random Forest, Naive Bayes, Linear Discriminant Analysis, and Quadratic Discriminant Analysis, were evaluated using leave-one-out cross-validation and the most accurate one was selected for final classification. The Linear SVM showed the best performance, correctly classifying 71.3%, 67.1%, 38.2%, and 55% of healthy, prehypertensive, Stage 1, and Stage 2 subjects, respectively. However, in a preliminary screening scenario aimed at prompting clinical follow-up for positive cases, the algorithm flagged 76.5% of prehypertensive, 97.1% of Stage 1, and 100% of Stage 2 individuals as belonging to one of the three hypertensive categories. Nonetheless, additional training data are needed to improve the model's accuracy.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Medical Engineering & Technology
Published
2025-05-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/03091902.2025.2506419
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.67
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of seven machine learning models in hypertension classification using photoplethysmographic and anthropometric data

Alessandro Gentilin
1 citations
Journal of Medical Engineering & Technology
Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
0.67
article

Comparison of seven machine learning models in hypertension classification using photoplethysmographic and anthropometric data

Alessandro Gentilin
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study presents an algorithm for classifying individuals into four hypertension categories (healthy, prehypertension, Stage 1, and Stage 2) using indices computed from photoplethysmographic (PPG) and anthropometric data. The dataset includes 219 individuals (115 women, 104 men, ages 21-86), with resting PPG signals, body mass index (BMI), age, weight, height, and resting heart rate. Key features (PPGAI, Ab, and Ad indices) were computed from the PPG signal. After dimensionality reduction through stepwise linear regression, the most informative predictors of hypertensive stages were identified for model training. Seven machine learning models, including Support Vector Machine (SVM), K-Nearest Neighbours, Logistic Regression, Random Forest, Naive Bayes, Linear Discriminant Analysis, and Quadratic Discriminant Analysis, were evaluated using leave-one-out cross-validation and the most accurate one was selected for final classification. The Linear SVM showed the best performance, correctly classifying 71.3%, 67.1%, 38.2%, and 55% of healthy, prehypertensive, Stage 1, and Stage 2 subjects, respectively. However, in a preliminary screening scenario aimed at prompting clinical follow-up for positive cases, the algorithm flagged 76.5% of prehypertensive, 97.1% of Stage 1, and 100% of Stage 2 individuals as belonging to one of the three hypertensive categories. Nonetheless, additional training data are needed to improve the model's accuracy.

Journal of Medical Engineering & TechnologyVol. 49(5)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
0.67
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.