Harnessing Machine Learning for Superior Prediction of Uniaxial Compressive Strength in Reinforced Soilcrete

Soilcrete is a composite material of soil and cement that is highly valued in the construction industry. Accurate measurement of its mechanical properties is essential, but laboratory testing methods are expensive, time-consuming, and include inaccuracies. Machine learning (ML) algorithms provide a more efficient alternative for this purpose, so after assessment with a statistical extraction method, ML algorithms including back-propagation neural network (BPNN), K-nearest neighbor (KNN), radial basis function (RBF), feed-forward neural networks (FFNN), and support vector regression (SVR) for predicting the uniaxial compressive strength (UCS) of soilcrete, were proposed in this study. The developed models in this study were optimized using an optimization technique, gradient descent (GD), throughout the analysis (direct optimization for neural networks and indirect optimization for other models corresponding to their hyperparameters). After doing laboratory analysis, data pre-preprocessing, and data-processing analysis, a database including 600 soilcrete specimens was gathered, which includes two different soil types (clay and limestone) and metakaolin as a mineral additive. 80% of the database was used for the training set and 20% for testing, considering eight input parameters, including metakaolin content, soil type, superplasticizer content, water-to-binder ratio, shrinkage, binder, density, and ultrasonic velocity. The analysis showed that most algorithms performed well in the prediction, with BPNN, KNN, and RBF having higher accuracy compared to others (R2 = 0.95, 0.95, 0.92, respectively). Based on this evaluation, it was observed that all models show an acceptable accuracy rate in prediction (RMSE: BPNN = 0.11, FFNN = 0.24, KNN = 0.05, SVR = 0.06, RBF = 0.05, MAD: BPNN = 0.006, FFNN = 0.012, KNN = 0.008, SVR = 0.006, RBF = 0.009). The ML importance ranking-sensitivity analysis indicated that all input parameters influence the UCS of soilcrete, especially the water-to-binder ratio and density, which have the most impact.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Computers, materials & continua/Computers, materials & continua (Print)
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.32604/cmc.2025.065748
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.95
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Harnessing Machine Learning for Superior Prediction of Uniaxial Compressive Strength in Reinforced Soilcrete

Arsalan Mahmoodzadeh, Faten Khalid Karim, Ala’a R. Al-Shamasneh
1 citations
Computers, materials & continua/Computers, materials & continua (Print)
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
0.95
article

Harnessing Machine Learning for Superior Prediction of Uniaxial Compressive Strength in Reinforced Soilcrete

Arsalan Mahmoodzadeh, Faten Khalid Karim, Ala’a R. Al-Shamasneh
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Soilcrete is a composite material of soil and cement that is highly valued in the construction industry. Accurate measurement of its mechanical properties is essential, but laboratory testing methods are expensive, time-consuming, and include inaccuracies. Machine learning (ML) algorithms provide a more efficient alternative for this purpose, so after assessment with a statistical extraction method, ML algorithms including back-propagation neural network (BPNN), K-nearest neighbor (KNN), radial basis function (RBF), feed-forward neural networks (FFNN), and support vector regression (SVR) for predicting the uniaxial compressive strength (UCS) of soilcrete, were proposed in this study. The developed models in this study were optimized using an optimization technique, gradient descent (GD), throughout the analysis (direct optimization for neural networks and indirect optimization for other models corresponding to their hyperparameters). After doing laboratory analysis, data pre-preprocessing, and data-processing analysis, a database including 600 soilcrete specimens was gathered, which includes two different soil types (clay and limestone) and metakaolin as a mineral additive. 80% of the database was used for the training set and 20% for testing, considering eight input parameters, including metakaolin content, soil type, superplasticizer content, water-to-binder ratio, shrinkage, binder, density, and ultrasonic velocity. The analysis showed that most algorithms performed well in the prediction, with BPNN, KNN, and RBF having higher accuracy compared to others (R2 = 0.95, 0.95, 0.92, respectively). Based on this evaluation, it was observed that all models show an acceptable accuracy rate in prediction (RMSE: BPNN = 0.11, FFNN = 0.24, KNN = 0.05, SVR = 0.06, RBF = 0.05, MAD: BPNN = 0.006, FFNN = 0.012, KNN = 0.008, SVR = 0.006, RBF = 0.009). The ML importance ranking-sensitivity analysis indicated that all input parameters influence the UCS of soilcrete, especially the water-to-binder ratio and density, which have the most impact.

Computers, materials & continua/Computers, materials & continua (Print)Vol. 84(1)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
0.95
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.