The Key Role of Keywords in Architectural Design: A Systemic Framework

The practice of architectural design is experiencing disruptive changes—e.g., the incredible growth of architects worldwide, the relevance of social media and the impact of artificial intelligence—typically analysed and studied as separate phenomena. Through a narrative research approach, this paper connects these emerging trends into a systemic view by referring to two conceptual frameworks—systems theory and transcendental phenomenology. Thus, it shows their mutual irritations, investigating the consequences of the practice of design and the collective architectural imaginary and mapping out the main findings through two diagrams. This paper recognises a series of key points of the resulting architectural system, the paramount being the extensive and mainly unconscious use of keywords. Then, clarifying the ontological dual nature of keywords, it conjectures that design will evolve differently for ordinary cases—characterised by passive keywords and competence—and for the most extraordinary ones—where mastery will have a critical role through active keywords.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Architecture
Published
2025-05-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/architecture5020032
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Design Education and Practice
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.43
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Key Role of Keywords in Architectural Design: A Systemic Framework

Carlo Deregibus
2 citations
Architecture
Design Education and Practice
1.43
article

The Key Role of Keywords in Architectural Design: A Systemic Framework

Carlo Deregibus
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The practice of architectural design is experiencing disruptive changes—e.g., the incredible growth of architects worldwide, the relevance of social media and the impact of artificial intelligence—typically analysed and studied as separate phenomena. Through a narrative research approach, this paper connects these emerging trends into a systemic view by referring to two conceptual frameworks—systems theory and transcendental phenomenology. Thus, it shows their mutual irritations, investigating the consequences of the practice of design and the collective architectural imaginary and mapping out the main findings through two diagrams. This paper recognises a series of key points of the resulting architectural system, the paramount being the extensive and mainly unconscious use of keywords. Then, clarifying the ontological dual nature of keywords, it conjectures that design will evolve differently for ordinary cases—characterised by passive keywords and competence—and for the most extraordinary ones—where mastery will have a critical role through active keywords.

ArchitectureVol. 5(2)
Politecnico di Torino (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Design Education and Practice
1.43
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.