Personalized Biopsy Schedules Using an Interval‐Censored Cause‐Specific Joint Model

Active surveillance (AS), where biopsies are conducted to detect cancer progression, has been acknowledged as an efficient way to reduce the overtreatment of prostate cancer. Most AS cohorts use fixed biopsy schedules for all patients. However, the ideal test frequency remains unknown, and the routine use of such invasive tests burdens the patients. An emerging idea is to generate personalized biopsy schedules based on each patient's progression-specific risk. To achieve that, we propose the interval-censored cause-specific joint model (ICJM), which models the impact of longitudinal biomarkers on cancer progression while considering the competing event of early treatment initiation. The underlying likelihood function incorporates the interval-censoring of cancer progression, the competing risk of treatment, and the uncertainty about whether cancer progression occurred since the last biopsy in patients that are right-censored or experience the competing event. The model can produce patient-specific risk profiles up to a horizon time. If the risk exceeds a certain threshold, a biopsy is conducted. The optimal threshold can be chosen by balancing two indicators of the biopsy schedules: The expected number of biopsies and the expected delay in detection of cancer progression. A simulation study showed that our personalized schedules could considerably reduce the number of biopsies per patient by 41%-52% compared to the fixed schedules, though at the cost of a slightly longer detection delay.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Statistics in Medicine
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.70134
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.63

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Personalized Biopsy Schedules Using an Interval‐Censored Cause‐Specific Joint Model

Nicole S. Erler, Eveline A.M. Heijnsdijk, Dimitris Rizopoulos, Zhenwei Yang et al.
1 citations
Statistics in Medicine
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
2.63
article

Personalized Biopsy Schedules Using an Interval‐Censored Cause‐Specific Joint Model

Nicole S. Erler, Eveline A.M. Heijnsdijk, Dimitris Rizopoulos, Zhenwei Yang, Lisa F. Newcomb
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Active surveillance (AS), where biopsies are conducted to detect cancer progression, has been acknowledged as an efficient way to reduce the overtreatment of prostate cancer. Most AS cohorts use fixed biopsy schedules for all patients. However, the ideal test frequency remains unknown, and the routine use of such invasive tests burdens the patients. An emerging idea is to generate personalized biopsy schedules based on each patient's progression-specific risk. To achieve that, we propose the interval-censored cause-specific joint model (ICJM), which models the impact of longitudinal biomarkers on cancer progression while considering the competing event of early treatment initiation. The underlying likelihood function incorporates the interval-censoring of cancer progression, the competing risk of treatment, and the uncertainty about whether cancer progression occurred since the last biopsy in patients that are right-censored or experience the competing event. The model can produce patient-specific risk profiles up to a horizon time. If the risk exceeds a certain threshold, a biopsy is conducted. The optimal threshold can be chosen by balancing two indicators of the biopsy schedules: The expected number of biopsies and the expected delay in detection of cancer progression. A simulation study showed that our personalized schedules could considerably reduce the number of biopsies per patient by 41%-52% compared to the fixed schedules, though at the cost of a slightly longer detection delay.

Statistics in MedicineVol. 44(10-12)
Utrecht University (NL), Erasmus MC (NL), University Medical Center Utrecht (NL), Fred Hutch Cancer Center (US)
National Institutes of Health
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
2.63
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.