Unveiling the linkages between greenwashing, brand hate, and negative consumer behavior: the moderating effect of environmental concern

Numerous companies are striving to improve their environmental reputation by highlighting their sustainability initiatives to the public. To do this, they are adopting green marketing strategies to gain a competitive advantage and appeal to environmentally aware consumers. However, not all claims made through green marketing truly reflect the companies’ actual environmental practices, leading to perceptions of greenwashing (GW). While previous research has focused on the financial and ethical consequences of GW, this study fills a key gap by exploring the emotional and behavioral reactions it triggers. In particular, this study, guided by expectancy violations theory, explores how GW contributes to brand hate (BH) and leads to negative consumer actions, such as consumer-brand boycott (CBB) and consumer-brand sabotage (CBS), while also investigating whether environmental concern (EC) influences the GW-BH relationship. To investigate these dynamics, data was gathered from 391 participants in Yemen using a convenience sampling technique and analyzed through structural equation modeling. The findings indicate that GW positively contributes to BH (b = 0.577, p < 0.01) at confidence intervals (0.445, 0.660), which in turn significantly influences both CBB (b = 0.499, p < 0.01) at confidence intervals (0.338, 0.644), and CBS (b = 0.600, p < 0.01) at confidence intervals (0.459,0.728). However, the moderating effect of EC on the GW-BH relationship was not supported (b = 0.053, p > 0.05) at confidence intervals (− 0.011, 0.186). This study extends EVT by demonstrating how unmet ethical and environmental expectations trigger intense consumer backlash, particularly within a collectivist and religiously influenced cultural context like Yemen. The findings also underscore the importance of cultural and ethical considerations in consumer responses to corporate sustainability claims. Practically, businesses should prioritize transparency and authenticity in their environmental initiatives to prevent reputational damage and consumer distrust. Moreover, companies operating in culturally sensitive markets must align sustainability claims with genuine environmental efforts to maintain credibility and consumer loyalty.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Discover Sustainability
Published
2025-05-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-025-01179-9
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Environmental Sustainability in Business
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.22

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Unveiling the linkages between greenwashing, brand hate, and negative consumer behavior: the moderating effect of environmental concern

Adeeb Alhebri, Nabil Ahmed Mareai Senan, Ibtisam Dhuwayhi Alanazi, Shaker M. Al-Kahtani et al.
3 citations
Discover Sustainability
Environmental Sustainability in Business
6.22
article

Unveiling the linkages between greenwashing, brand hate, and negative consumer behavior: the moderating effect of environmental concern

Adeeb Alhebri, Nabil Ahmed Mareai Senan, Ibtisam Dhuwayhi Alanazi, Shaker M. Al-Kahtani, Mohammed A. Alshadadi, Amani AbdAlatti, Reda Abdelfattah Mohammad
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Numerous companies are striving to improve their environmental reputation by highlighting their sustainability initiatives to the public. To do this, they are adopting green marketing strategies to gain a competitive advantage and appeal to environmentally aware consumers. However, not all claims made through green marketing truly reflect the companies’ actual environmental practices, leading to perceptions of greenwashing (GW). While previous research has focused on the financial and ethical consequences of GW, this study fills a key gap by exploring the emotional and behavioral reactions it triggers. In particular, this study, guided by expectancy violations theory, explores how GW contributes to brand hate (BH) and leads to negative consumer actions, such as consumer-brand boycott (CBB) and consumer-brand sabotage (CBS), while also investigating whether environmental concern (EC) influences the GW-BH relationship. To investigate these dynamics, data was gathered from 391 participants in Yemen using a convenience sampling technique and analyzed through structural equation modeling. The findings indicate that GW positively contributes to BH (b = 0.577, p < 0.01) at confidence intervals (0.445, 0.660), which in turn significantly influences both CBB (b = 0.499, p < 0.01) at confidence intervals (0.338, 0.644), and CBS (b = 0.600, p < 0.01) at confidence intervals (0.459,0.728). However, the moderating effect of EC on the GW-BH relationship was not supported (b = 0.053, p > 0.05) at confidence intervals (− 0.011, 0.186). This study extends EVT by demonstrating how unmet ethical and environmental expectations trigger intense consumer backlash, particularly within a collectivist and religiously influenced cultural context like Yemen. The findings also underscore the importance of cultural and ethical considerations in consumer responses to corporate sustainability claims. Practically, businesses should prioritize transparency and authenticity in their environmental initiatives to prevent reputational damage and consumer distrust. Moreover, companies operating in culturally sensitive markets must align sustainability claims with genuine environmental efforts to maintain credibility and consumer loyalty.

Discover SustainabilityVol. 6(1)
Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University (SA), Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada University (IN), Taiz University (YE), University of Modern Sciences (YE), 1 Decembrie 1918 University (RO), University of Business and Technology (SA), Modern Specialized University, King Khalid University (SA), College of Business Administration (LV)
Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Environmental Sustainability in Business
6.22
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.