Zero-inflated models for the evaluation of colorectal polyps in colon cancer screening studies—a value-based biostatistics practice

We suggest colonoscopy studies should jointly use the polyp detection rate and polyp counts as the quality measure. Based on theoretical, empirical, and simulation considerations, we encourage analysts to utilize zero-inflated models for evaluating colorectal polyps in colonoscopy screening studies for proper clinical interpretation of data and accurate reporting of findings. A similar approach can also be used for analyzing other types of polyp counts in colonoscopy studies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PeerJ
Published
2025-05-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.19504
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.05
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Zero-inflated models for the evaluation of colorectal polyps in colon cancer screening studies—a value-based biostatistics practice

Marc J. Zuckerman, Sherif Elhanafi, Mohamed O. Othman, Alok Dwivedi
1 citations
PeerJ
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
1.05
article

Zero-inflated models for the evaluation of colorectal polyps in colon cancer screening studies—a value-based biostatistics practice

Marc J. Zuckerman, Sherif Elhanafi, Mohamed O. Othman, Alok Dwivedi
article en
1 citations

Abstract

We suggest colonoscopy studies should jointly use the polyp detection rate and polyp counts as the quality measure. Based on theoretical, empirical, and simulation considerations, we encourage analysts to utilize zero-inflated models for evaluating colorectal polyps in colonoscopy screening studies for proper clinical interpretation of data and accurate reporting of findings. A similar approach can also be used for analyzing other types of polyp counts in colonoscopy studies.

PeerJVol. 13
Texas Tech University (US), Baylor College of Medicine (US), Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
1.05
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.