Eye-tracking research in mathematics and statistics education: recent developments and future trends. A systematic literature review

Abstract Eye tracking is gaining significance in mathematics education research at a tremendous speed. For the discipline to grow, it is essential to monitor, structure, and synthesize the research in this rapidly evolving field, which calls for a systematic literature review. However, a comprehensive and systematic review does not exist for the research for the past five years. This is a profound gap considering the dynamics of the field, which is fueled by technological advancements in hard- and software and the increasing usability and availability of eye-tracking systems. The aim of this paper is to provide a comprehensive and systematic literature review on eye-tracking research in mathematics and statistics education published in the past five years. Using a systematic database search, we identified and reviewed 116 eye-tracking studies published between 2019 and the first quarter of 2024. We found that the studies addressed a wide range of topics in all relevant curriculum content areas as well as a multitude of phenomena, including teacher-student interaction and digital learning. Interestingly, the studies increasingly involved school students, partially in authentic classroom settings. We also found that the majority of the papers referred to a theoretical framework or made assumptions about the (domain-specific) interpretation of eye movements explicit. As a further important trend, probably still in its infancy, we observed the use of AI techniques for data analysis purposes, which allows for qualitative insights despite bigger numbers of participants. Our paper provides an overview and detailed insights into trends, of which many have not been visible in earlier review studies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ZDM
Published
2025-05-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-025-01699-8
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
10.59

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Eye-tracking research in mathematics and statistics education: recent developments and future trends. A systematic literature review

Maike Schindler, Lukas Baumanns, Anna Lisa Simon, Achim J. Lilienthal
5 citations
ZDM
Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
10.59
article

Eye-tracking research in mathematics and statistics education: recent developments and future trends. A systematic literature review

Maike Schindler, Lukas Baumanns, Anna Lisa Simon, Achim J. Lilienthal
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Abstract Eye tracking is gaining significance in mathematics education research at a tremendous speed. For the discipline to grow, it is essential to monitor, structure, and synthesize the research in this rapidly evolving field, which calls for a systematic literature review. However, a comprehensive and systematic review does not exist for the research for the past five years. This is a profound gap considering the dynamics of the field, which is fueled by technological advancements in hard- and software and the increasing usability and availability of eye-tracking systems. The aim of this paper is to provide a comprehensive and systematic literature review on eye-tracking research in mathematics and statistics education published in the past five years. Using a systematic database search, we identified and reviewed 116 eye-tracking studies published between 2019 and the first quarter of 2024. We found that the studies addressed a wide range of topics in all relevant curriculum content areas as well as a multitude of phenomena, including teacher-student interaction and digital learning. Interestingly, the studies increasingly involved school students, partially in authentic classroom settings. We also found that the majority of the papers referred to a theoretical framework or made assumptions about the (domain-specific) interpretation of eye movements explicit. As a further important trend, probably still in its infancy, we observed the use of AI techniques for data analysis purposes, which allows for qualitative insights despite bigger numbers of participants. Our paper provides an overview and detailed insights into trends, of which many have not been visible in earlier review studies.

ZDMVol. 57(4)
University of Cologne (DE), TU Dortmund University (DE), Örebro University (SE), Technical University of Munich (DE)
Universität zu Köln
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
10.59
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.