Experience With Face Groups Impacts Face Processing, but Not Face Differentiation in 6‐ and 9‐Month‐Old Infants

The present study examined neural differentiation of faces from familiar and unfamiliar race groups at 6 and 9 months of age. Two of four face groups (one familiar and one unfamiliar) were shown to infants based on parent reports of infant face experience. Infants completed a fast periodic visual stimulation (FPVS) EEG task in which separate blocks of familiar and unfamiliar face groups, equated for low-level visual differences, were presented at a rate of 6 Hz. Within each block, a different individual was presented at 1.2 Hz (every fifth face). A medial occipital 6 Hz neural response was greater for faces from the familiar compared to the unfamiliar group, which was primarily driven by the 6-month-old age group. A robust occipital 1.2 Hz response was present for both ages and for both familiar and unfamiliar face groups, suggesting individual-level face differentiation. However, the topography of the 1.2 Hz response differed for 6- and 9-month-olds and suggests that face differentiation becomes increasingly right lateralized with age. The present results highlight the importance of face experience on visuocortical brain responses associated with face processing (6 Hz) and suggest that face differentiation (1.2 Hz) is present by 6 months of age and not impacted by face familiarity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Developmental Psychobiology
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/dev.70050
Primary Topic
Face Recognition and Perception
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Experience With Face Groups Impacts Face Processing, but Not Face Differentiation in 6‐ and 9‐Month‐Old Infants

Gabriella Silva, Ryan Barry‐Anwar, Lisa S. Scott, Jessica Sanches Braga Figueira et al.
1 links
Developmental Psychobiology
Face Recognition and Perception
article

Experience With Face Groups Impacts Face Processing, but Not Face Differentiation in 6‐ and 9‐Month‐Old Infants

Gabriella Silva, Ryan Barry‐Anwar, Lisa S. Scott, Jessica Sanches Braga Figueira, Andreas Keil, Maeve R. Boylan, Grace Wallsinger
article en

Abstract

The present study examined neural differentiation of faces from familiar and unfamiliar race groups at 6 and 9 months of age. Two of four face groups (one familiar and one unfamiliar) were shown to infants based on parent reports of infant face experience. Infants completed a fast periodic visual stimulation (FPVS) EEG task in which separate blocks of familiar and unfamiliar face groups, equated for low-level visual differences, were presented at a rate of 6 Hz. Within each block, a different individual was presented at 1.2 Hz (every fifth face). A medial occipital 6 Hz neural response was greater for faces from the familiar compared to the unfamiliar group, which was primarily driven by the 6-month-old age group. A robust occipital 1.2 Hz response was present for both ages and for both familiar and unfamiliar face groups, suggesting individual-level face differentiation. However, the topography of the 1.2 Hz response differed for 6- and 9-month-olds and suggests that face differentiation becomes increasingly right lateralized with age. The present results highlight the importance of face experience on visuocortical brain responses associated with face processing (6 Hz) and suggest that face differentiation (1.2 Hz) is present by 6 months of age and not impacted by face familiarity.

Developmental PsychobiologyVol. 67(3)
University of Florida (US)
National Science Foundation, National Institutes of Health, National Institute on Drug Abuse, National Eye Institute
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Face Recognition and Perception
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.