Connect Geophysical Data Interpretation and Geology Through Inversion for Anisotropic Magnetic Susceptibility

ABSTRACT Anisotropic magnetic susceptibility, as an intrinsic property that records the strain history a rock formation experienced, has been widely used in structural geological studies based on direct specimen measurements. By comparing measurements of anisotropic parameters on drill samples from different locations, rock formations can be differentiated into different or the same groups. However, the applications of anisotropic magnetic susceptibility in geophysical data interpretation are rare due to its complexity in inverse problems, despite its long‐recognized influence on induced magnetization. In this work, we present a one‐dimensional inversion algorithm that simultaneously recovers two principal susceptibility components. To connect geophysical data with geology differentiation through different anisotropies, the inversion is constrained by fuzzy C‐means clustering to enforce coherency in the parameter space for model values within the same rock formation. Under the assumption of a sedimentary scenario, the synthetic tests show that, when the data are influenced by anisotropy, the inversion for an isotropic model could fail to reproduce the data, while inverting for an anisotropic model with clustering can lead to better data recovery and produce valuable information about different formations. We also test our method with field data published by the United States Geological Survey over the Wyoming Salient. The inversion results and their comparison against geochronological records reveal connections between airborne magnetic data and geology, including structures and rock formations originating from different geologic ages.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geophysical Prospecting
Published
2025-05-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2478.70037
Primary Topic
Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Connect Geophysical Data Interpretation and Geology Through Inversion for Anisotropic Magnetic Susceptibility

Zhuo Liu, Yaoguo Li
Geophysical Prospecting
Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies
article

Connect Geophysical Data Interpretation and Geology Through Inversion for Anisotropic Magnetic Susceptibility

Zhuo Liu, Yaoguo Li
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Anisotropic magnetic susceptibility, as an intrinsic property that records the strain history a rock formation experienced, has been widely used in structural geological studies based on direct specimen measurements. By comparing measurements of anisotropic parameters on drill samples from different locations, rock formations can be differentiated into different or the same groups. However, the applications of anisotropic magnetic susceptibility in geophysical data interpretation are rare due to its complexity in inverse problems, despite its long‐recognized influence on induced magnetization. In this work, we present a one‐dimensional inversion algorithm that simultaneously recovers two principal susceptibility components. To connect geophysical data with geology differentiation through different anisotropies, the inversion is constrained by fuzzy C‐means clustering to enforce coherency in the parameter space for model values within the same rock formation. Under the assumption of a sedimentary scenario, the synthetic tests show that, when the data are influenced by anisotropy, the inversion for an isotropic model could fail to reproduce the data, while inverting for an anisotropic model with clustering can lead to better data recovery and produce valuable information about different formations. We also test our method with field data published by the United States Geological Survey over the Wyoming Salient. The inversion results and their comparison against geochronological records reveal connections between airborne magnetic data and geology, including structures and rock formations originating from different geologic ages.

Geophysical ProspectingVol. 73(6)
Colorado School of Mines (US)
Colorado School of Mines
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.