Investigating the impact of green banking initiatives on bank performance: empirical evidence from emerging economy

This paper aims to contribute to the existing literature by investigating how green banking determinants including control variables such as bank-specific and macroeconomic determinants affect the performance of conventional banks estimated with profitability measures such as return on assets (ROA), return on equity (ROE), and net interest margin (NIM) considering both static and dynamic models depending on the data set spanning from 2013 to 2022 for 13 banks in emerging economies like Bangladesh. We have adopted various econometric models such as pooled OLS, fixed effect, random effect, generalized least squares (GLS) method, and one-step-system GMM to estimate both static and dynamic nexus between green banking initiatives and bank performance followed by testing the validity of the models using different diagnostic tests such as multi-collinearity test, heteroscedasticity test, model specification bias test, and autocorrelation test. Moreover, the Hausman test and B/P LM test have been executed to make a comparison between the models. The key findings of our empirical section reveal that among green banking factors, only the board risk management committee has a significant negative impact on ROA whereas ATM has a significant positive impact on ROE. The green finance ratio and the board risk management committee have a significant positive impact on NIM, while employee green banking training, ATMs, and online banking branches have a negative impact. Credit risk, bank size, and non-interest income (for ROA and NIM) are significant control variables that adversely affect profitability, as are credit risk and the cost-to-income ratio (for ROE). Besides, the loan-to-deposit ratio and cost-to-income ratio have been found statistically significant in negatively influencing the NIM and ROA respectively. In the GMM model, one year-lagged ROE and NIM inversely affect current ROE and NIM, respectively, while lagged ROA is insignificant for current ROA. These findings infer that determinants of green banking initiatives significantly affect banks’ profitability while fostering environmental sustainability. Moreover, this paper emphasizes the need to manage credit risk and the cost-to-income ratio to secure financial reliability followed by providing significant insights to policymakers about how banking practices can be aligned with global sustainability through specific incentives and regulations. However, this study is only limited to quantitative data due to the absence of judgmental factors from bank officials, so the estimation is focused on the homogenous sample which may lessen the generalizability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Discover Sustainability
Published
2025-05-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-025-01279-6
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
12.52
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Investigating the impact of green banking initiatives on bank performance: empirical evidence from emerging economy

Raad Mozib Lalon, Mohammad Omer Faruk, Khaled Bin Amir
4 citations
Discover Sustainability
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
12.52
article

Investigating the impact of green banking initiatives on bank performance: empirical evidence from emerging economy

Raad Mozib Lalon, Mohammad Omer Faruk, Khaled Bin Amir
article en
4 citations

Abstract

This paper aims to contribute to the existing literature by investigating how green banking determinants including control variables such as bank-specific and macroeconomic determinants affect the performance of conventional banks estimated with profitability measures such as return on assets (ROA), return on equity (ROE), and net interest margin (NIM) considering both static and dynamic models depending on the data set spanning from 2013 to 2022 for 13 banks in emerging economies like Bangladesh. We have adopted various econometric models such as pooled OLS, fixed effect, random effect, generalized least squares (GLS) method, and one-step-system GMM to estimate both static and dynamic nexus between green banking initiatives and bank performance followed by testing the validity of the models using different diagnostic tests such as multi-collinearity test, heteroscedasticity test, model specification bias test, and autocorrelation test. Moreover, the Hausman test and B/P LM test have been executed to make a comparison between the models. The key findings of our empirical section reveal that among green banking factors, only the board risk management committee has a significant negative impact on ROA whereas ATM has a significant positive impact on ROE. The green finance ratio and the board risk management committee have a significant positive impact on NIM, while employee green banking training, ATMs, and online banking branches have a negative impact. Credit risk, bank size, and non-interest income (for ROA and NIM) are significant control variables that adversely affect profitability, as are credit risk and the cost-to-income ratio (for ROE). Besides, the loan-to-deposit ratio and cost-to-income ratio have been found statistically significant in negatively influencing the NIM and ROA respectively. In the GMM model, one year-lagged ROE and NIM inversely affect current ROE and NIM, respectively, while lagged ROA is insignificant for current ROA. These findings infer that determinants of green banking initiatives significantly affect banks’ profitability while fostering environmental sustainability. Moreover, this paper emphasizes the need to manage credit risk and the cost-to-income ratio to secure financial reliability followed by providing significant insights to policymakers about how banking practices can be aligned with global sustainability through specific incentives and regulations. However, this study is only limited to quantitative data due to the absence of judgmental factors from bank officials, so the estimation is focused on the homogenous sample which may lessen the generalizability.

Discover SustainabilityVol. 6(1)
University of Dhaka (BD)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
12.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.