Investor Suitability: Discrepancies between the Opinions of Experts and Retail Investors

Abstract To investigate which factors should be assessed by investor profile analysis/suitability questionnaires (IPAQ) in the opinions of Brazilian investors, we applied a questionnaire with open and closed questions to 11 researchers in the field of behavioral finance (RSCHR), 31 financial market professionals (PRO) and 28 individual investors (II). We analyzed their answers using text-mining techniques with visual representations of semantic networks. Despite the discrepancies in the RSCHR, PRO, and II opinions, the results show that the IPAQ should analyze 20 factors. Furthermore, some sociodemographic factors assessed by national financial institutions may be less relevant than other unmeasured psychological factors.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Psicologia Teoria e Pesquisa
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1590/0102.3772e41502.en
Primary Topic
Risk Management in Financial Firms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Investor Suitability: Discrepancies between the Opinions of Experts and Retail Investors

Nicolas de Oliveira Cardoso, Wagner de Lara Machado, Claudia Emiko Yoshinaga
Psicologia Teoria e Pesquisa
Risk Management in Financial Firms
article

Investor Suitability: Discrepancies between the Opinions of Experts and Retail Investors

Nicolas de Oliveira Cardoso, Wagner de Lara Machado, Claudia Emiko Yoshinaga
article en

Abstract

Abstract To investigate which factors should be assessed by investor profile analysis/suitability questionnaires (IPAQ) in the opinions of Brazilian investors, we applied a questionnaire with open and closed questions to 11 researchers in the field of behavioral finance (RSCHR), 31 financial market professionals (PRO) and 28 individual investors (II). We analyzed their answers using text-mining techniques with visual representations of semantic networks. Despite the discrepancies in the RSCHR, PRO, and II opinions, the results show that the IPAQ should analyze 20 factors. Furthermore, some sociodemographic factors assessed by national financial institutions may be less relevant than other unmeasured psychological factors.

Psicologia Teoria e PesquisaVol. 41
Fundação Getulio Vargas (BR), Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (BR)
Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Risk Management in Financial Firms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Investor Suitability: Discrepancies between the Opinions of Experts and Retail Investors — Nicolas de Oliveira Cardoso, Wagner de Lara Machado, et al. · Psicologia Teoria e Pesquisa (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS