A Different View of Phraseological Complexity: The Role of Density, Diversity and Distance

This study discusses the current approach to the construct of phraseological complexity, which has captured the attention of second language research in the last few years. It assumes that the two current dimensions of phraseological complexity – diversity and sophistication – do not adequately represent, in its application to phraseology, the notion of structural complexity, that is, the objective dimension of linguistic complexity, independent from any cognitive and developmental dynamics. Echoing Pallotti’s (2015) “simple view of linguistic complexity”, the study thus proposes a different view of phraseological complexity as a multidimensional construct. It suggests that structural phraseological complexity can be described by the three complementary dimensions of density, diversity and distance. Finally, it presents a case study exploring the correlation between the three proposed dimensions and proficiency in texts produced by intermediate and advanced learners of Italian, and by Italian native speakers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the European Second Language Association
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22599/jesla.136
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Second Language Acquisition and Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.44
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Different View of Phraseological Complexity: The Role of Density, Diversity and Distance

Stefania Spina
1 citations
Journal of the European Second Language Association
Second Language Acquisition and Learning
3.44
article

A Different View of Phraseological Complexity: The Role of Density, Diversity and Distance

Stefania Spina
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study discusses the current approach to the construct of phraseological complexity, which has captured the attention of second language research in the last few years. It assumes that the two current dimensions of phraseological complexity – diversity and sophistication – do not adequately represent, in its application to phraseology, the notion of structural complexity, that is, the objective dimension of linguistic complexity, independent from any cognitive and developmental dynamics. Echoing Pallotti’s (2015) “simple view of linguistic complexity”, the study thus proposes a different view of phraseological complexity as a multidimensional construct. It suggests that structural phraseological complexity can be described by the three complementary dimensions of density, diversity and distance. Finally, it presents a case study exploring the correlation between the three proposed dimensions and proficiency in texts produced by intermediate and advanced learners of Italian, and by Italian native speakers.

Journal of the European Second Language AssociationVol. 9(1)
University of Perugia (IT)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Second Language Acquisition and Learning
3.44
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.