Use of digital health tools with point‐of‐care testing improves access to germline genetic testing within a gastrointestinal cancer clinic

Many patients who qualify for cancer germline genetic testing do not get offered such testing. Digital health tools (DHTs) and point-of-care (POC) genetic testing have both shown promise to increase access to cancer genetic testing in certain settings. However, there is scant evidence on the impact of either DHTs or POC in gastrointestinal (GI) cancer clinics or on the combined use of DHTs and POC testing. We aimed to determine whether POC genetic testing with DHTs improves (1) the identification of patients for genetic testing and (2) the uptake of genetic testing within a multidisciplinary GI cancer clinic. A retrospective before-and-after study design was used. Data was collected by chart review. Outcomes were the proportion of patients (1) identified for genetic evaluation and (2) consented to genetic testing. In the before group (n = 24), patients were identified for genetic evaluation by physicians and referred to a genetic counseling clinic for testing. In the after group (n = 32), patients had access to POC genetic testing with support from DHTs. The study cohort (n = 56) was 51.8% female with a mean age of 61.1 years (SD = 12.2) and predominantly White (58.8%) or African American (39.2%). In the before group, 6/24 (25%) patients were identified for genetic evaluation compared to 17/32 (53%) in the after group (p = 0.03). Genetic testing uptake was 0% (0/24) in the before group and 25% (8/32) in the after group (p = 0.02). The use of DHTs and a POC genetic testing model improved the identification of patients for genetic testing. While uptake improved, it remained low, suggesting additional approaches are needed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Genetic Counseling
Published
2025-05-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jgc4.70047
Primary Topic
BRCA gene mutations in cancer
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Use of digital health tools with point‐of‐care testing improves access to germline genetic testing within a gastrointestinal cancer clinic

Colleen Caleshu, Danielle C. Bonadies, Jessica Johnson Denton, Catherine C. Smith
Journal of Genetic Counseling
BRCA gene mutations in cancer
article

Use of digital health tools with point‐of‐care testing improves access to germline genetic testing within a gastrointestinal cancer clinic

Colleen Caleshu, Danielle C. Bonadies, Jessica Johnson Denton, Catherine C. Smith
article en

Abstract

Many patients who qualify for cancer germline genetic testing do not get offered such testing. Digital health tools (DHTs) and point-of-care (POC) genetic testing have both shown promise to increase access to cancer genetic testing in certain settings. However, there is scant evidence on the impact of either DHTs or POC in gastrointestinal (GI) cancer clinics or on the combined use of DHTs and POC testing. We aimed to determine whether POC genetic testing with DHTs improves (1) the identification of patients for genetic testing and (2) the uptake of genetic testing within a multidisciplinary GI cancer clinic. A retrospective before-and-after study design was used. Data was collected by chart review. Outcomes were the proportion of patients (1) identified for genetic evaluation and (2) consented to genetic testing. In the before group (n = 24), patients were identified for genetic evaluation by physicians and referred to a genetic counseling clinic for testing. In the after group (n = 32), patients had access to POC genetic testing with support from DHTs. The study cohort (n = 56) was 51.8% female with a mean age of 61.1 years (SD = 12.2) and predominantly White (58.8%) or African American (39.2%). In the before group, 6/24 (25%) patients were identified for genetic evaluation compared to 17/32 (53%) in the after group (p = 0.03). Genetic testing uptake was 0% (0/24) in the before group and 25% (8/32) in the after group (p = 0.02). The use of DHTs and a POC genetic testing model improved the identification of patients for genetic testing. While uptake improved, it remained low, suggesting additional approaches are needed.

Journal of Genetic CounselingVol. 34(3)
University of Alabama at Birmingham (US), Artificial Cell Technologies (United States) (US), Second Genome (United States) (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
BRCA gene mutations in cancer
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.