Narrative power in the narrative policy framework

Abstract The Narrative Policy Framework lacks clear and empirical explanations of power. Yet, the study of narratives is inherently the study of power in shaping policy outputs and decisions. We develop a conceptual model positing that expressions of power ( power to , with, and over ) may be discovered in narrative constructs (e.g., narrative structure, communication forum). We suggest that the dilemma of measuring the “unobserved” in power may be addressed methodologically using a counterfactual (e.g., experiment, comparative study). Finally, we uphold the use of keystone NPF variables (e.g., policy decisions, attention) as proxy measures of the outcomes of narrative power in the policy process. Taken together, this model advances the operationalization and measurement of narrative power in the policy process.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Policy Studies Journal
Published
2025-05-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.70038
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Policy Transfer and Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
25.57
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Narrative power in the narrative policy framework

Elizabeth A. Albright, Rob A. DeLeo, Elizabeth A. Shanahan, Thomas A. Birkland et al.
3 citations
Policy Studies Journal
Policy Transfer and Learning
25.57
article

Narrative power in the narrative policy framework

Elizabeth A. Albright, Rob A. DeLeo, Elizabeth A. Shanahan, Thomas A. Birkland, Danielle Blanch‐Hartigan, Deserai A. Crow, Kristin Taylor, Honey Minkowitz, Elizabeth A. Koebele
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract The Narrative Policy Framework lacks clear and empirical explanations of power. Yet, the study of narratives is inherently the study of power in shaping policy outputs and decisions. We develop a conceptual model positing that expressions of power ( power to , with, and over ) may be discovered in narrative constructs (e.g., narrative structure, communication forum). We suggest that the dilemma of measuring the “unobserved” in power may be addressed methodologically using a counterfactual (e.g., experiment, comparative study). Finally, we uphold the use of keystone NPF variables (e.g., policy decisions, attention) as proxy measures of the outcomes of narrative power in the policy process. Taken together, this model advances the operationalization and measurement of narrative power in the policy process.

Policy Studies Journal
University of Nebraska at Omaha (US), University of Nevada, Reno (US), North Carolina State University (US), Bentley University (US), Duke University (US), Wayne State University (US), Montana State University (US), University of Colorado Denver (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Policy Transfer and Learning
25.57
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.