Neural correlates of conspiracy beliefs during information evaluation

Conspiracy theories, despite their widespread societal impact, remain poorly understood at the neural level. While previous research has examined general belief processing, the neural mechanisms underlying how conspiracy beliefs influence information evaluation remain unclear. This study examined how individual differences in conspiracy belief modulate neural responses to conspiracy-related versus factual information using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Thirty-one participants, pre-screened for high versus low conspiracy beliefs using validated scales, evaluated the veracity of matched conspiracy-related and factual statements during scanning. Behaviorally, high conspiracy believers were more likely to endorse conspiracy statements, whereas both groups evaluated factual information similarly. Neurally, a double dissociation emerged: high conspiracy believers exhibited increased activation in the ventromedial and dorsomedial prefrontal cortices-regions implicated in value-based decision-making and belief uncertainty-when evaluating conspiracy-related content. In contrast, low conspiracy believers showed greater activation in the hippocampus and precuneus, areas associated with episodic and semantic memory retrieval. These findings indicate that conspiracy beliefs engage distinct neurocognitive pathways in a content-specific manner. Rather than reflecting a generalized bias, belief-related neural differences selectively emerge during the processing of conspiratorial information. This study offers novel insight into the neural basis of belief persistence and may inform strategies for promoting critical reasoning in the face of misinformation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-05-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-03723-z
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Misinformation and Its Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.20

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Neural correlates of conspiracy beliefs during information evaluation

Shuguang Zhao, Bingsen Xiong, Ting Wang
1 citations
Scientific Reports
Misinformation and Its Impacts
4.20
article

Neural correlates of conspiracy beliefs during information evaluation

Shuguang Zhao, Bingsen Xiong, Ting Wang
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Conspiracy theories, despite their widespread societal impact, remain poorly understood at the neural level. While previous research has examined general belief processing, the neural mechanisms underlying how conspiracy beliefs influence information evaluation remain unclear. This study examined how individual differences in conspiracy belief modulate neural responses to conspiracy-related versus factual information using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Thirty-one participants, pre-screened for high versus low conspiracy beliefs using validated scales, evaluated the veracity of matched conspiracy-related and factual statements during scanning. Behaviorally, high conspiracy believers were more likely to endorse conspiracy statements, whereas both groups evaluated factual information similarly. Neurally, a double dissociation emerged: high conspiracy believers exhibited increased activation in the ventromedial and dorsomedial prefrontal cortices-regions implicated in value-based decision-making and belief uncertainty-when evaluating conspiracy-related content. In contrast, low conspiracy believers showed greater activation in the hippocampus and precuneus, areas associated with episodic and semantic memory retrieval. These findings indicate that conspiracy beliefs engage distinct neurocognitive pathways in a content-specific manner. Rather than reflecting a generalized bias, belief-related neural differences selectively emerge during the processing of conspiratorial information. This study offers novel insight into the neural basis of belief persistence and may inform strategies for promoting critical reasoning in the face of misinformation.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
Beijing Normal University (CN), Renmin University of China (CN)
Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Misinformation and Its Impacts
4.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Neural correlates of conspiracy beliefs during information evaluation — Shuguang Zhao, Bingsen Xiong, et al. · Scientific Reports (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS