Attrition rates and treatment outcomes in multiple myeloma: real-world data over a 40-year period

The treatment landscape of multiple myeloma (MM) has evolved significantly over four decades, driven by novel therapies and optimized supportive care. However, the attrition rate (AR), defined as the proportion of patients who die without advancing to the next line of therapy (LOT) after treatment failure, remains a major challenge. To assess how treatment patterns and outcomes have evolved, we analyzed 1,297 MM patients treated between 1980 and 2020, stratified by diagnosis period and age. ARs declined from 38-55% in the 1980s to 15-20% in 2010-2020, but remained high in older patients, with 46.9% of those over 80 unable to proceed beyond first LOT. While progression-free survival gains were primarily observed in the first LOT (15.8 to 24.1 months, p = 0.001), overall survival (OS) improved across all LOTs and age groups, likely due to more effective salvage therapies and supportive care. Achieving a complete response in first-line therapy was associated with a significant OS benefit (4.5 vs. 1.6 years, p < 0.001), underscoring its importance, as many patients, particularly older ones, are less likely to reach subsequent LOTs. Despite advances in MM treatment, patient loss to attrition remains a challenge, highlighting the need for more effective therapies early in the disease course.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Blood Cancer Journal
Published
2025-05-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41408-025-01311-y
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.85

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Attrition rates and treatment outcomes in multiple myeloma: real-world data over a 40-year period

Arturo Pereira, Esther Carcelero, Laura Rosiñol, Noemí Llobet et al.
5 citations
Blood Cancer Journal
Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
8.85
article

Attrition rates and treatment outcomes in multiple myeloma: real-world data over a 40-year period

Arturo Pereira, Esther Carcelero, Laura Rosiñol, Noemí Llobet, Luis Gerardo Rodríguez‐Lobato, Joan Bladé, Natalia Tovar, Carlos Fernández de Larrea, David F. Moreno, María Teresa Cibeira, Anna de Daniel, Daniel Munárriz, J. M. Palacios Mateos
article en
5 citations

Abstract

The treatment landscape of multiple myeloma (MM) has evolved significantly over four decades, driven by novel therapies and optimized supportive care. However, the attrition rate (AR), defined as the proportion of patients who die without advancing to the next line of therapy (LOT) after treatment failure, remains a major challenge. To assess how treatment patterns and outcomes have evolved, we analyzed 1,297 MM patients treated between 1980 and 2020, stratified by diagnosis period and age. ARs declined from 38-55% in the 1980s to 15-20% in 2010-2020, but remained high in older patients, with 46.9% of those over 80 unable to proceed beyond first LOT. While progression-free survival gains were primarily observed in the first LOT (15.8 to 24.1 months, p = 0.001), overall survival (OS) improved across all LOTs and age groups, likely due to more effective salvage therapies and supportive care. Achieving a complete response in first-line therapy was associated with a significant OS benefit (4.5 vs. 1.6 years, p < 0.001), underscoring its importance, as many patients, particularly older ones, are less likely to reach subsequent LOTs. Despite advances in MM treatment, patient loss to attrition remains a challenge, highlighting the need for more effective therapies early in the disease course.

Blood Cancer JournalVol. 15(1)
Hospital Clínic de Barcelona (ES), Consorci Institut D'Investigacions Biomediques August Pi I Sunyer (ES), Universitat de Barcelona (ES)
European Commission, Fundación Científica Asociación Española Contra el Cáncer, Generalitat de Catalunya, CRIS Cancer Foundation, Agència de Gestió d'Ajuts Universitaris i de Recerca, Instituto de Salud Carlos III
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
8.85
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.