Is What Comes out the Same as What Goes in? A Preliminary Investigation of the Isotopic Impacts of Digestion by Red‐Tailed Hawks (<scp><i>Buteo jamaicensis</i></scp>) and Eurasian Eagle Owls (<scp><i>Bubo bubo</i></scp>)
We investigated isotopic diet-excreta offset (Δ<sub>diet-excreta</sub>) for predatory birds, and the isotopic influence of bird digestion on consumed prey tissues. Foraging ecology of predatory birds can be non-invasively monitored using excreta or regurgitated prey. However, one must account for Δ<sub>diet-excreta</sub> and any influence of digestion on prey tissues. Neither of these has been previously evaluated for predatory birds. We worked with a captive Eurasian eagle owl (<i>Bubo bubo</i>) and red-tailed hawk (<i>Buteo jamaicensis</i>) fed frozen murid rats. We collected rat feet, as well as regurgitated pellets and excreta from each bird's enclosure. We analyzed carbon (δ<sup>13</sup>C) and nitrogen (δ<sup>15</sup>N) isotopes in undigested rat muscle, undigested and digested fur, and bone collagen (extracted from pellets), δ<sup>13</sup>C, oxygen (δ<sup>18</sup>O), and strontium (<sup>87</sup>Sr/<sup>86</sup>Sr) isotopes in rat bone bioapatite, and δ<sup>13</sup>C, δ<sup>15</sup>N, and <sup>87</sup>Sr/<sup>86</sup>Sr in bird excreta. Diet-excreta offset differed slightly between individuals and depended on how we estimated diet (muscle alone or muscle + collagen) and if excreta were acidified. We tentatively suggest using +1 to 1.5‰ for Δ<sup>13</sup>C<sub>diet-excreta</sub> and +0.5 to 1‰ for Δ<sup>15</sup>N<sub>diet-excreta</sub> when working with proteinaceous tissues and unacidified or acidified excreta, respectively. For bioapatite, we suggest +9 to 10‰ for Δ<sup>13</sup>C<sub>diet-excreta</sub> and +0.001 for <sup>87</sup>Sr/<sup>86</sup>Sr<sub>diet-excreta</sub>. Fur isotopes, collagen δ<sup>15</sup>N, and bioapatite δ<sup>18</sup>O were unaffected by digestion, but <sup>87</sup>Sr/<sup>86</sup>Sr decreased by 0.0005 to 0.001, and collagen and bioapatite δ<sup>13</sup>C shifted 0.5 to 1‰ (decreasing collagen-apatite spacing by 1.5 to 2‰). For both birds, Δ<sub>diet-excreta</sub> for carbon and strontium were similar to previous studies, but nitrogen was notably different, possibly because excreta contained some urine or urates, or because raptors have distinct digestive physiologies. The influence of digestion on bone δ<sup>13</sup>C and <sup>87</sup>Sr/<sup>86</sup>Sr is large enough to affect interpretations of diet and bioavailable strontium. Researchers should use caution if relying on potentially digested bone to evaluate the diet of consumed prey, establish strontium baselines, or infer past climate or environmental conditions.
Authors
- Rachel Reid (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2091-0701)
- Brooke E. Crowley (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8462-6806)
- M. Greenwood
Institutions
- University of Cincinnati (US)
- Virginia Tech (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Ecology and Evolution
- Published
- 2025-05-01
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.71211
- Primary Topic
- Isotope Analysis in Ecology
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00