Is What Comes out the Same as What Goes in? A Preliminary Investigation of the Isotopic Impacts of Digestion by Red‐Tailed Hawks (<scp><i>Buteo jamaicensis</i></scp>) and Eurasian Eagle Owls (<scp><i>Bubo bubo</i></scp>)

We investigated isotopic diet-excreta offset (Δ<sub>diet-excreta</sub>) for predatory birds, and the isotopic influence of bird digestion on consumed prey tissues. Foraging ecology of predatory birds can be non-invasively monitored using excreta or regurgitated prey. However, one must account for Δ<sub>diet-excreta</sub> and any influence of digestion on prey tissues. Neither of these has been previously evaluated for predatory birds. We worked with a captive Eurasian eagle owl (<i>Bubo bubo</i>) and red-tailed hawk (<i>Buteo jamaicensis</i>) fed frozen murid rats. We collected rat feet, as well as regurgitated pellets and excreta from each bird's enclosure. We analyzed carbon (δ<sup>13</sup>C) and nitrogen (δ<sup>15</sup>N) isotopes in undigested rat muscle, undigested and digested fur, and bone collagen (extracted from pellets), δ<sup>13</sup>C, oxygen (δ<sup>18</sup>O), and strontium (<sup>87</sup>Sr/<sup>86</sup>Sr) isotopes in rat bone bioapatite, and δ<sup>13</sup>C, δ<sup>15</sup>N, and <sup>87</sup>Sr/<sup>86</sup>Sr in bird excreta. Diet-excreta offset differed slightly between individuals and depended on how we estimated diet (muscle alone or muscle + collagen) and if excreta were acidified. We tentatively suggest using +1 to 1.5‰ for Δ<sup>13</sup>C<sub>diet-excreta</sub> and +0.5 to 1‰ for Δ<sup>15</sup>N<sub>diet-excreta</sub> when working with proteinaceous tissues and unacidified or acidified excreta, respectively. For bioapatite, we suggest +9 to 10‰ for Δ<sup>13</sup>C<sub>diet-excreta</sub> and +0.001 for <sup>87</sup>Sr/<sup>86</sup>Sr<sub>diet-excreta</sub>. Fur isotopes, collagen δ<sup>15</sup>N, and bioapatite δ<sup>18</sup>O were unaffected by digestion, but <sup>87</sup>Sr/<sup>86</sup>Sr decreased by 0.0005 to 0.001, and collagen and bioapatite δ<sup>13</sup>C shifted 0.5 to 1‰ (decreasing collagen-apatite spacing by 1.5 to 2‰). For both birds, Δ<sub>diet-excreta</sub> for carbon and strontium were similar to previous studies, but nitrogen was notably different, possibly because excreta contained some urine or urates, or because raptors have distinct digestive physiologies. The influence of digestion on bone δ<sup>13</sup>C and <sup>87</sup>Sr/<sup>86</sup>Sr is large enough to affect interpretations of diet and bioavailable strontium. Researchers should use caution if relying on potentially digested bone to evaluate the diet of consumed prey, establish strontium baselines, or infer past climate or environmental conditions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ecology and Evolution
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.71211
Primary Topic
Isotope Analysis in Ecology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Is What Comes out the Same as What Goes in? A Preliminary Investigation of the Isotopic Impacts of Digestion by Red‐Tailed Hawks (Buteo jamaicensis) and Eurasian Eagle Owls (Bubo bubo)

Rachel Reid, Brooke E. Crowley, M. Greenwood
Ecology and Evolution
Isotope Analysis in Ecology
article

Is What Comes out the Same as What Goes in? A Preliminary Investigation of the Isotopic Impacts of Digestion by Red‐Tailed Hawks (Buteo jamaicensis) and Eurasian Eagle Owls (Bubo bubo)

Rachel Reid, Brooke E. Crowley, M. Greenwood
article en

Abstract

We investigated isotopic diet-excreta offset (Δ<sub>diet-excreta</sub>) for predatory birds, and the isotopic influence of bird digestion on consumed prey tissues. Foraging ecology of predatory birds can be non-invasively monitored using excreta or regurgitated prey. However, one must account for Δ<sub>diet-excreta</sub> and any influence of digestion on prey tissues. Neither of these has been previously evaluated for predatory birds. We worked with a captive Eurasian eagle owl (<i>Bubo bubo</i>) and red-tailed hawk (<i>Buteo jamaicensis</i>) fed frozen murid rats. We collected rat feet, as well as regurgitated pellets and excreta from each bird's enclosure. We analyzed carbon (δ<sup>13</sup>C) and nitrogen (δ<sup>15</sup>N) isotopes in undigested rat muscle, undigested and digested fur, and bone collagen (extracted from pellets), δ<sup>13</sup>C, oxygen (δ<sup>18</sup>O), and strontium (<sup>87</sup>Sr/<sup>86</sup>Sr) isotopes in rat bone bioapatite, and δ<sup>13</sup>C, δ<sup>15</sup>N, and <sup>87</sup>Sr/<sup>86</sup>Sr in bird excreta. Diet-excreta offset differed slightly between individuals and depended on how we estimated diet (muscle alone or muscle + collagen) and if excreta were acidified. We tentatively suggest using +1 to 1.5‰ for Δ<sup>13</sup>C<sub>diet-excreta</sub> and +0.5 to 1‰ for Δ<sup>15</sup>N<sub>diet-excreta</sub> when working with proteinaceous tissues and unacidified or acidified excreta, respectively. For bioapatite, we suggest +9 to 10‰ for Δ<sup>13</sup>C<sub>diet-excreta</sub> and +0.001 for <sup>87</sup>Sr/<sup>86</sup>Sr<sub>diet-excreta</sub>. Fur isotopes, collagen δ<sup>15</sup>N, and bioapatite δ<sup>18</sup>O were unaffected by digestion, but <sup>87</sup>Sr/<sup>86</sup>Sr decreased by 0.0005 to 0.001, and collagen and bioapatite δ<sup>13</sup>C shifted 0.5 to 1‰ (decreasing collagen-apatite spacing by 1.5 to 2‰). For both birds, Δ<sub>diet-excreta</sub> for carbon and strontium were similar to previous studies, but nitrogen was notably different, possibly because excreta contained some urine or urates, or because raptors have distinct digestive physiologies. The influence of digestion on bone δ<sup>13</sup>C and <sup>87</sup>Sr/<sup>86</sup>Sr is large enough to affect interpretations of diet and bioavailable strontium. Researchers should use caution if relying on potentially digested bone to evaluate the diet of consumed prey, establish strontium baselines, or infer past climate or environmental conditions.

Ecology and EvolutionVol. 15(5)
University of Cincinnati (US), Virginia Tech (US)
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Isotope Analysis in Ecology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.