Leading police organisations in crises: how changing customary police leadership responses impacts on frontline officers’ senses of ontological security

The coronavirus pandemic presented the UK police service with extraordinary and unanticipated challenges. The central role of the police in protecting public health situated frontline officers in unaccustomed territory with citizens, colleagues, and leaders. Incongruence between legislative powers and public health messaging created policy ambiguity for police officers in respect of everyday interactions with citizens, while the pandemic’s social restrictions necessitated intraorganisational adjustments. These included a hugely accelerated expansion of technologically mediated communication, and the ability for officers who did not have public-facing roles to work from home. The changes resulted in modifications to the customary, established, command and control procedure used by the police when responding to critical and crisis situations; the so-called Gold, Silver, Bronze (GSB) structure, which has over the past four decades become the routinised, anticipated organisational response to such situations. In this paper we explore whether the ontological security of frontline officers was undermined by pandemic policing’s disruption to these standardised intraorganisational procedures for leading critical and crisis situations. Using empirical data from a mixed method study within two UK police forces, we examine the issue from the frontline officer perspective. Despite organisationally adopting the normatively anticipated response, the GSB model’s adaptation resulted in reduced volumes of proximal support, communication, and direction from senior leaders, and did not therefore meet frontline officers’ normative expectations of crisis command and leadership, a consequence of which was weakened levels of ontological security within frontline officers. As everyday working practices develop within policing, we propose that the study exposes potential weakness in the GSB structure.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Policing & Society
Published
2025-05-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/10439463.2025.2508201
Primary Topic
Policing Practices and Perceptions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Leading police organisations in crises: how changing customary police leadership responses impacts on frontline officers’ senses of ontological security

Denise Martin, Neil Leslie
Policing & Society
Policing Practices and Perceptions
article

Leading police organisations in crises: how changing customary police leadership responses impacts on frontline officers’ senses of ontological security

Denise Martin, Neil Leslie
article en

Abstract

The coronavirus pandemic presented the UK police service with extraordinary and unanticipated challenges. The central role of the police in protecting public health situated frontline officers in unaccustomed territory with citizens, colleagues, and leaders. Incongruence between legislative powers and public health messaging created policy ambiguity for police officers in respect of everyday interactions with citizens, while the pandemic’s social restrictions necessitated intraorganisational adjustments. These included a hugely accelerated expansion of technologically mediated communication, and the ability for officers who did not have public-facing roles to work from home. The changes resulted in modifications to the customary, established, command and control procedure used by the police when responding to critical and crisis situations; the so-called Gold, Silver, Bronze (GSB) structure, which has over the past four decades become the routinised, anticipated organisational response to such situations. In this paper we explore whether the ontological security of frontline officers was undermined by pandemic policing’s disruption to these standardised intraorganisational procedures for leading critical and crisis situations. Using empirical data from a mixed method study within two UK police forces, we examine the issue from the frontline officer perspective. Despite organisationally adopting the normatively anticipated response, the GSB model’s adaptation resulted in reduced volumes of proximal support, communication, and direction from senior leaders, and did not therefore meet frontline officers’ normative expectations of crisis command and leadership, a consequence of which was weakened levels of ontological security within frontline officers. As everyday working practices develop within policing, we propose that the study exposes potential weakness in the GSB structure.

Policing & SocietyVol. 35(10)
Abertay University (GB)
Scottish Funding Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Policing Practices and Perceptions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Leading police organisations in crises: how changing customary police leadership responses impacts on frontline officers’ senses of ontological security — Denise Martin, Neil Leslie · Policing & Society (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS