Navigating fintech and banking risks: insights from a systematic literature review

This study presents a comprehensive systematic literature review (SLR) of research on the relationship between financial technology (fintech) and bank risk. A total of 1837 articles were reviewed in WOS and Scopus from 2019–2023. The Reporting Standards for Systematic Synthesis of Evidence (ROSES) were used to identify 28 high-quality articles that robustly analyse the relationship between fintech and bank risk. This study categorizes fintech measures into bank-level (financial innovation, use of online channels), country-level (digital finance index, commercial bank digital transformation index), and fintech keywords (social media platforms, documents). It identifies four main bank risk themes: insolvency, credit, market, and liquidity risk. The review also highlights mediating variables such as operational efficiency, the capital adequacy ratio, and the net interest margin and moderating variables such as digital transformation, financial regulation, and economic uncertainty. Our findings highlight three key insights. First, most research does not mention theory, which suggests an integrated multitheoretical approach. Second, there is a notable gap in cross-country research on this topic. We recommend that future studies focus on comparative cross-country analysis to provide broader insights into the fintech–bank risk nexus. Third, the relationship between fintech and bank risk has received increasing academic interest, with more scholars utilizing interdisciplinary methods, expanding the geographical scope, and addressing emerging risks. This SLR provides valuable insights for researchers, policymakers, and industry practitioners to equip them with the knowledge to improve financial stability and strengthen risk management strategies in the evolving banking sector.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Published
2025-05-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-05055-9
Citations
4
Primary Topic
FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.14
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Navigating fintech and banking risks: insights from a systematic literature review

Aisyah Abdul-Rahman, Syajarul Imna Mohd Amin, Roslan Ja’afar, Yang Liu
4 citations
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance
9.14
article

Navigating fintech and banking risks: insights from a systematic literature review

Aisyah Abdul-Rahman, Syajarul Imna Mohd Amin, Roslan Ja’afar, Yang Liu
article en
4 citations

Abstract

This study presents a comprehensive systematic literature review (SLR) of research on the relationship between financial technology (fintech) and bank risk. A total of 1837 articles were reviewed in WOS and Scopus from 2019–2023. The Reporting Standards for Systematic Synthesis of Evidence (ROSES) were used to identify 28 high-quality articles that robustly analyse the relationship between fintech and bank risk. This study categorizes fintech measures into bank-level (financial innovation, use of online channels), country-level (digital finance index, commercial bank digital transformation index), and fintech keywords (social media platforms, documents). It identifies four main bank risk themes: insolvency, credit, market, and liquidity risk. The review also highlights mediating variables such as operational efficiency, the capital adequacy ratio, and the net interest margin and moderating variables such as digital transformation, financial regulation, and economic uncertainty. Our findings highlight three key insights. First, most research does not mention theory, which suggests an integrated multitheoretical approach. Second, there is a notable gap in cross-country research on this topic. We recommend that future studies focus on comparative cross-country analysis to provide broader insights into the fintech–bank risk nexus. Third, the relationship between fintech and bank risk has received increasing academic interest, with more scholars utilizing interdisciplinary methods, expanding the geographical scope, and addressing emerging risks. This SLR provides valuable insights for researchers, policymakers, and industry practitioners to equip them with the knowledge to improve financial stability and strengthen risk management strategies in the evolving banking sector.

Humanities and Social Sciences CommunicationsVol. 12(1)
National University of Malaysia (MY)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance
9.14
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.