Appels alternés entre la liberté d’expression et la liberté de la religion : mise en relation de moments politiques au Canada contemporain

This article analyses how arguments in Canadian newspaper op eds that promote the freedom of expression can serve as conduits for Islamophobia. To reflect on this slippage, we compare opinion pieces in five English-language daily newspapers on 2019’s Law 21 in Québec, and discussions surrounding Motion 103 in 2017, and the appointment of Amira Elghawaby as Canada’s Special Representative on Islamophobia in 2023. We show how ‘freedom of religion’ and ‘freedom of expression’ frameworks both construct a tolerant and modern Canadian nation in contrast to Québec. English-language media tend to promote Law 21 as discriminatory towards religious minorities, particularly Muslims, while their discussions of Motion 103 and the appointment of Amira Elghawaby nevertheless contain arguments with an Islamophobic slant. We conclude that anti-Islamophobia discourse in the Canadian English-language media thus remains fragile.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Studies in Religion/Sciences Religieuses
Published
2025-05-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00084298251330636
Primary Topic
Religion and Society Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Appels alternés entre la liberté d’expression et la liberté de la religion : mise en relation de moments politiques au Canada contemporain

Amélie Barras, Jennifer A. Selby
Studies in Religion/Sciences Religieuses
Religion and Society Interactions
article

Appels alternés entre la liberté d’expression et la liberté de la religion : mise en relation de moments politiques au Canada contemporain

Amélie Barras, Jennifer A. Selby
article en

Abstract

This article analyses how arguments in Canadian newspaper op eds that promote the freedom of expression can serve as conduits for Islamophobia. To reflect on this slippage, we compare opinion pieces in five English-language daily newspapers on 2019’s Law 21 in Québec, and discussions surrounding Motion 103 in 2017, and the appointment of Amira Elghawaby as Canada’s Special Representative on Islamophobia in 2023. We show how ‘freedom of religion’ and ‘freedom of expression’ frameworks both construct a tolerant and modern Canadian nation in contrast to Québec. English-language media tend to promote Law 21 as discriminatory towards religious minorities, particularly Muslims, while their discussions of Motion 103 and the appointment of Amira Elghawaby nevertheless contain arguments with an Islamophobic slant. We conclude that anti-Islamophobia discourse in the Canadian English-language media thus remains fragile.

Studies in Religion/Sciences ReligieusesVol. 54(4)
Memorial University of Newfoundland (CA), York University (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Religion and Society Interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.