Discours des religieux sur la pandémie au Pérou (2020–2021) : se conformer aux directives de l’État ou les rejeter ? Faire confiance à Dieu et/ou à la science ?

This article analyzes the official position of Peruvian religious institutions, particularly Pentecostal ones, in response to the health emergency of COVID-19 (2020–2021), in the context characterized by precarity and multiple deficiencies. Using netnography and an ethnographic case study method, we examine the reactions of various churches. While a significant sector of the religious field, generally the most institutionalized, remained officially confident in the scientific approach assumed by the government to confront the pandemic, others, inspired by transnational connections related to North American conservative currents and promoting conspiracy theories and eschatological views, have introduced more ambiguous, even dissenting, discourses. Our analysis shows that diversity exists in the most structured institutions such as the Catholic Church and some dogmatic independent churches. Many members maintain their independence and do not follow the leaders’ instructions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Compass
Published
2025-05-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00377686251336960
Primary Topic
Religion, Society, and Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Discours des religieux sur la pandémie au Pérou (2020–2021) : se conformer aux directives de l’État ou les rejeter ? Faire confiance à Dieu et/ou à la science ?

Juan Fonseca, Véronique Lecaros, Jair Rolleri
Social Compass
Religion, Society, and Development
article

Discours des religieux sur la pandémie au Pérou (2020–2021) : se conformer aux directives de l’État ou les rejeter ? Faire confiance à Dieu et/ou à la science ?

Juan Fonseca, Véronique Lecaros, Jair Rolleri
article en

Abstract

This article analyzes the official position of Peruvian religious institutions, particularly Pentecostal ones, in response to the health emergency of COVID-19 (2020–2021), in the context characterized by precarity and multiple deficiencies. Using netnography and an ethnographic case study method, we examine the reactions of various churches. While a significant sector of the religious field, generally the most institutionalized, remained officially confident in the scientific approach assumed by the government to confront the pandemic, others, inspired by transnational connections related to North American conservative currents and promoting conspiracy theories and eschatological views, have introduced more ambiguous, even dissenting, discourses. Our analysis shows that diversity exists in the most structured institutions such as the Catholic Church and some dogmatic independent churches. Many members maintain their independence and do not follow the leaders’ instructions.

Social CompassVol. 72(2)
Peruvian University of Applied Sciences (PE), Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú (PE)
Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Religion, Society, and Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.