Satire Versus Illicit: Policy Issues Regarding the Creation of Deepfakes Using AI Technology

The emergence of deepfake technology, which uses artificial intelligence to create hyper-realistic videos or images by superimposing one person's face onto another's body, presents significant legal, ethical, and societal challenges. This study explores public perceptions of deepfakes, focusing on their legality and ethical implications. Participants evaluated various scenarios that differed in purpose (illicit or satirical) and the target's public profile (e.g., celebrity, politician, private citizen). Results revealed a generally negative view of deepfakes, with illicit deepfakes being less acceptable than satirical ones and those involving private citizens deemed the least permissible. Penalties for creators of illicit deepfakes were harsher, particularly when perceived harm and intent to harm were significant factors. The results highlight the importance of developing legal frameworks on deepfake creation, as well as possible practical implications within the realm of forensic psychology.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Behavioral Sciences & the Law
Published
2025-05-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.2726
Primary Topic
Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Satire Versus Illicit: Policy Issues Regarding the Creation of Deepfakes Using AI Technology

Christopher S. Peters, Sungjin Im, Abby J. McGinnis, Hannah L. Hennessey
Behavioral Sciences & the Law
Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
article

Satire Versus Illicit: Policy Issues Regarding the Creation of Deepfakes Using AI Technology

Christopher S. Peters, Sungjin Im, Abby J. McGinnis, Hannah L. Hennessey
article en

Abstract

The emergence of deepfake technology, which uses artificial intelligence to create hyper-realistic videos or images by superimposing one person's face onto another's body, presents significant legal, ethical, and societal challenges. This study explores public perceptions of deepfakes, focusing on their legality and ethical implications. Participants evaluated various scenarios that differed in purpose (illicit or satirical) and the target's public profile (e.g., celebrity, politician, private citizen). Results revealed a generally negative view of deepfakes, with illicit deepfakes being less acceptable than satirical ones and those involving private citizens deemed the least permissible. Penalties for creators of illicit deepfakes were harsher, particularly when perceived harm and intent to harm were significant factors. The results highlight the importance of developing legal frameworks on deepfake creation, as well as possible practical implications within the realm of forensic psychology.

Behavioral Sciences & the LawVol. 43(4)
Western Carolina University (US), Western Kentucky University (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Satire Versus Illicit: Policy Issues Regarding the Creation of Deepfakes Using AI Technology — Christopher S. Peters, Sungjin Im, et al. · Behavioral Sciences & the Law (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS