LUB: A Novel Adaptive Kriging Framework Incorporating Lower and Upper Bound Analysis for Enhanced Structural Reliability-Based Design Optimization

Reliability-based design optimization (RBDO) is increasingly recognized for its potential to enhance the performance of structural engineering systems. Despite its potential, traditional RBDO methods are often hampered by significant computational challenges, especially when applied to nonlinear structures where simultaneous execution of structural optimization and reliability analysis increases the complexity of analysis. This computational burden presents a significant barrier for broader application of RBDO in complex systems, which therefore highlights the need for more efficient approaches. To address this challenge, we introduce an adaptive Kriging-assisted RBDO framework that leverages lower and upper bounds (LUB) analysis to improve its computational efficiency and robustness. In this proposed framework, regions delineated by varying confidence bounds are used for identifying design points close to the limit state. Convergence is rigorously assessed by comparing design and reliability predictions across upper and lower bound interfaces, thereby ensuring both interpretability and robustness. The framework allows for flexibility through its seamless integration with various adaptive sampling processes, evolutionary optimization algorithms, and reliability assessment techniques. The proposed framework is evaluated for four benchmark examples and two engineering cases, demonstrating superior accuracy and efficiency with fewer model evaluations compared with existing approaches. Through iterative optimization, the framework consistently maintains cost and errors of reliability estimation within predefined thresholds, offering robust and computationally efficient solutions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems Part A Civil Engineering
Published
2025-05-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1061/ajrua6.rueng-1562
Primary Topic
Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

LUB: A Novel Adaptive Kriging Framework Incorporating Lower and Upper Bound Analysis for Enhanced Structural Reliability-Based Design Optimization

Oya Mercan, Cheng Chen, Changle Peng, Weijie Xu et al.
1 links
ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems Part A Civil Engineering
Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design
article

LUB: A Novel Adaptive Kriging Framework Incorporating Lower and Upper Bound Analysis for Enhanced Structural Reliability-Based Design Optimization

Oya Mercan, Cheng Chen, Changle Peng, Weijie Xu, Tong Guo
article en

Abstract

Reliability-based design optimization (RBDO) is increasingly recognized for its potential to enhance the performance of structural engineering systems. Despite its potential, traditional RBDO methods are often hampered by significant computational challenges, especially when applied to nonlinear structures where simultaneous execution of structural optimization and reliability analysis increases the complexity of analysis. This computational burden presents a significant barrier for broader application of RBDO in complex systems, which therefore highlights the need for more efficient approaches. To address this challenge, we introduce an adaptive Kriging-assisted RBDO framework that leverages lower and upper bounds (LUB) analysis to improve its computational efficiency and robustness. In this proposed framework, regions delineated by varying confidence bounds are used for identifying design points close to the limit state. Convergence is rigorously assessed by comparing design and reliability predictions across upper and lower bound interfaces, thereby ensuring both interpretability and robustness. The framework allows for flexibility through its seamless integration with various adaptive sampling processes, evolutionary optimization algorithms, and reliability assessment techniques. The proposed framework is evaluated for four benchmark examples and two engineering cases, demonstrating superior accuracy and efficiency with fewer model evaluations compared with existing approaches. Through iterative optimization, the framework consistently maintains cost and errors of reliability estimation within predefined thresholds, offering robust and computationally efficient solutions.

ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems Part A Civil EngineeringVol. 11(3)
University of Toronto (CA), Southeast University (BD), San Francisco State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.