Normative range of <scp>MRI</scp> ‐based fetal body volume and association with ultrasonographically estimated fetal weight at 16–36 weeks: prospective study

We provide a normative range for MRI-FBV from 16 to 36 GW, which can be used for clinical and research purposes. The strong association observed between MRI-FBV and US-EFW throughout pregnancy supports the potential for MRI-FBV to be used as a reliable alternative for EFW, particularly in clinical scenarios in which traditional US methods may be limited. Furthermore, the comparison of the four published MRI- or CT-based formulae with US-EFW indicated that our model had the strongest association with US-EFW. © 2025 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology
Published
2025-05-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.29234
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.23
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Normative range of MRI ‐based fetal body volume and association with ultrasonographically estimated fetal weight at 16–36 weeks: prospective study

G. Gorincour, G. Gauchard, J. De Jesus Neves, D. Grévent et al.
4 citations
Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology
Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
8.23
article

Normative range of MRI ‐based fetal body volume and association with ultrasonographically estimated fetal weight at 16–36 weeks: prospective study

G. Gorincour, G. Gauchard, J. De Jesus Neves, D. Grévent, Amine Bouachba, Raphaël Bartin, Laurent Salomon, Benjamin Glémain, L. Bobet, N. Roux, L. Bussières, J. Virfollet
article en
4 citations

Abstract

We provide a normative range for MRI-FBV from 16 to 36 GW, which can be used for clinical and research purposes. The strong association observed between MRI-FBV and US-EFW throughout pregnancy supports the potential for MRI-FBV to be used as a reliable alternative for EFW, particularly in clinical scenarios in which traditional US methods may be limited. Furthermore, the comparison of the four published MRI- or CT-based formulae with US-EFW indicated that our model had the strongest association with US-EFW. © 2025 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Ultrasound in Obstetrics and GynecologyVol. 66(1)
Inserm (FR), Mediterranean University (ME), Sorbonne Université (FR), Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris (FR), Zero to Three (US), Université Paris Lumières (FR), Institut Pierre Louis d‘Épidémiologie et de Santé Publique (FR), Institut Méditerranéen d’Océanologie (FR), Fédération pour la recherche en explorations thérapeutiques innovantes in utero
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
8.23
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.