Researching Language-Based Teaching: Walking the Walls of our Thinking

In this essay, I use the title to organize an argument about the particular—and possibly unique—place of researching second language teacher education in educational research more generally. The argument rests on two points. First, rather than simply applying methods to problems, researching is a process of taking a position both epistemologically and ontologically. Second, because language plays a unique role in how we experience our lives and worlds, it plays with usual ways of thinking and organizing educating teachers. Basically, we are positioning ourselves conceptually and practically in this havoc through the ideas we use as researchers and teacher educators in second language teacher education. As building blocks of our thinking, these ideas categorize and organize how we design and conduct studies and how we develop and implement teacher education activities and programs. In so doing the ideas create possibilities as well as blind spots, a process which I refer to here the ‘walls of our thinking’.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Language Teacher Education Research
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.32038/lter.2024.01.05
Primary Topic
Second Language Learning and Teaching
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Researching Language-Based Teaching: Walking the Walls of our Thinking

Donald Freeman
Language Teacher Education Research
Second Language Learning and Teaching
article

Researching Language-Based Teaching: Walking the Walls of our Thinking

Donald Freeman
article en

Abstract

In this essay, I use the title to organize an argument about the particular—and possibly unique—place of researching second language teacher education in educational research more generally. The argument rests on two points. First, rather than simply applying methods to problems, researching is a process of taking a position both epistemologically and ontologically. Second, because language plays a unique role in how we experience our lives and worlds, it plays with usual ways of thinking and organizing educating teachers. Basically, we are positioning ourselves conceptually and practically in this havoc through the ideas we use as researchers and teacher educators in second language teacher education. As building blocks of our thinking, these ideas categorize and organize how we design and conduct studies and how we develop and implement teacher education activities and programs. In so doing the ideas create possibilities as well as blind spots, a process which I refer to here the ‘walls of our thinking’.

Language Teacher Education ResearchVol. 01
University of Michigan (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Second Language Learning and Teaching
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Researching Language-Based Teaching: Walking the Walls of our Thinking — Donald Freeman · Language Teacher Education Research (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS