Analysing Patient Preferences for TPA and Cash-Based Payment Methods in Oncology Daycare Settings

Background: Financial accessibility in oncology care significantly impacts treatment adherence and healthcare efficiency. Understanding payment preferences can highlight systemic gaps and inform policy improvements. Methods: This retrospective study analyzed payment trends in an oncology daycare unit over three months, evaluating cash, Third-Party Administrators (TPA), and other payment methods through descriptive statistics and trend analysis. Results: Cash transactions accounted for approximately 65% of all payments, while TPA usage constituted 30%, with minor variations over time. Despite the efficiency of insurance-based payments, cash remained the dominant mode, suggesting potential barriers to TPA adoption. Discussion: The preference for cash may stem from limited insurance coverage, bureaucratic delays, and the frequent nature of oncology treatments requiring recurrent approvals. The findings raise concerns about financial accessibility and the need for insurance reforms to improve patient convenience. Conclusion: Streamlining insurance processes, expanding coverage, and increasing patient awareness could enhance financial accessibility and reduce the economic burden on oncology patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JOURNAL OF NOVEL RESEARCH AND INNOVATIVE DEVELOPMENT
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.56975/jnrid.v3i2.701081
Primary Topic
Health and Wellbeing Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analysing Patient Preferences for TPA and Cash-Based Payment Methods in Oncology Daycare Settings

Manish Jain, A Malhotra, Charu Sachdeva, Rajesh Sachdeva
JOURNAL OF NOVEL RESEARCH AND INNOVATIVE DEVELOPMENT
Health and Wellbeing Research
article

Analysing Patient Preferences for TPA and Cash-Based Payment Methods in Oncology Daycare Settings

Manish Jain, A Malhotra, Charu Sachdeva, Rajesh Sachdeva
article en

Abstract

Background: Financial accessibility in oncology care significantly impacts treatment adherence and healthcare efficiency. Understanding payment preferences can highlight systemic gaps and inform policy improvements. Methods: This retrospective study analyzed payment trends in an oncology daycare unit over three months, evaluating cash, Third-Party Administrators (TPA), and other payment methods through descriptive statistics and trend analysis. Results: Cash transactions accounted for approximately 65% of all payments, while TPA usage constituted 30%, with minor variations over time. Despite the efficiency of insurance-based payments, cash remained the dominant mode, suggesting potential barriers to TPA adoption. Discussion: The preference for cash may stem from limited insurance coverage, bureaucratic delays, and the frequent nature of oncology treatments requiring recurrent approvals. The findings raise concerns about financial accessibility and the need for insurance reforms to improve patient convenience. Conclusion: Streamlining insurance processes, expanding coverage, and increasing patient awareness could enhance financial accessibility and reduce the economic burden on oncology patients.

JOURNAL OF NOVEL RESEARCH AND INNOVATIVE DEVELOPMENTVol. 3(2)
Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Centre (IN)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Health and Wellbeing Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.